[Alberta's Child]

I didn't read all six of these (I don't click on Breitbart due to excessive pop-ups and ads), but I disagree with #2 as evidence of the "illegitimacy" of Clinton's nomination.

There's nothing sacred about the voting process in a primary campaign. Different states use different methods to name their delegates, and there's nothing in our constitution that even mentions political parties, let alone a nomination process for them.

[TakebackGOP]

But no other candidate had a chance of winning the primary, and she only had one real opponent.

[Capt. Tom]

There's nothing sacred about the voting process in a primary campaign. Different states use different methods to name their delegates, and there's nothing in our constitution that even mentions political parties, let alone a nomination process for them.

I agree with you on that.

Political parties have no more of a right to nominate a candidate than your local country club.

They can do it by any means even if it means putting all their candidates on a spinning wheel and spinnnin it and supporting the one whose name comes up.

There is nothing sacred about political parties and their candidates, or how they are nominated. -Tom

[Balding_Eagle]

(I don't click on Breitbart due to excessive pop-ups and ads)

I could tell you about AdBlocker, but I'm sure you've heard it a hundred times.

It's time to install it, or shut up and quit complaining.