PIAPS’s nomination was totally legal. She gamed the system. In hindsight, her nomination was boneheaded and short sighted, but not illegal.
The final point in the article touches on illegal immigration and the lack of voter scrutiny at the polls. The democrats want to dilute the rights of citizens by allowing anyone to vote. This effort is certainly illegal.
A quibble: The collusion or interference of the “Justice” Department with the FBI, resulting in no indictment against Clinton for her email crimes, was itself a crime. That crime, or crimes, kept her in the “race”.
Suppose, ad argumentum, that you were a Trump Elector - and you learned that Trump had either a Clinton Cash problem or a server gate problem. Would you not have voted for a different Republican?Hillary had both of those things. On top of Travelgate, Castle Grande, Rose Law Firm billing records, blaming Benghazi on an innocent private citizen . . .
When we see one of our two major parties nominating a Hillary Clinton - and when we see “the mainstream media” (which I prefer to denote as wire service journalism) functioning sub rosa as a part of that same party, and the head of that party publicly exhorting non-citizens to vote - “Houston, we have a problem.”
Wouldn’t it be amazing if President Trump said so in his State of the Union address!
You’re missing the point of the counter-meme. This is taking the Democrats’ meme and throwing it back at them. A fair number, I’d say close to half, were Bernie supporters and therefore very susceptible. If you look at every single thing they’re shrieking about, it seems to have an underlying motivation as a means to cover for their own problems. Russian hacking? Russian stooge? Want to start a war with Russia? Hillary, Hillary and Hillary. Same with illegitimately elected. Hillary. Same with lurid sex allegations. Hillary, well, her husband. On and on.
>> her nomination was ... not illegal.
There is a big difference between illegal and illegitimate. Elections under communist regimes are wholly legal, and everyone, who knows what’s good for them, votes for the approved communist candidate. Is that legitimate?