Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hmmm. Guess folks believing she was a crap candidate had nothing to do with it. Is anyone keeping a list of excuses the dems keep bringing up. This is getting absurd and from my view point, hard as it is to believe, the msm keeps getting more and more irrelevant with every story the put out. And people are starting to take notice on the left as well. That would be the alt-left radical extremist wing.
1 posted on 01/14/2017 9:31:12 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: rktman

NON print version:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/latest-why-she-lost-clinton-conspiracy-theory-is-about-people-seeing-tabloids-in-grocery-lines/


2 posted on 01/14/2017 9:32:55 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Yeah, deplorables are STUPID.


3 posted on 01/14/2017 9:34:19 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I always read the headlines in the check out lines. When I went regularly to the beauty parlor (I don’t go anymore because they finally made me permanently cute), I would read the articles. The woman who did my manicures and I would go through and say, ugly, cute, hate him/her, love him/her. Great mindlessness. I miss that more than I miss the manicures. She had a track record of voting for the winner in every presidential race since she was able to vote at 18 (she’s in her 50s). She blew it this year. HAHAHA


4 posted on 01/14/2017 9:34:59 AM PST by Mercat (Men never do evil so fully and cheerfully as when they do it out of conscience.” (Blaise Pascal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

She lost because she sucked as a candidate and did not campaign very hard.
She never visited Wisconsin.
She thought the Ministry of Propaganda would get her elected.


5 posted on 01/14/2017 9:35:09 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

She said something towards the end, can’t remember what but it sounded exactly like the ‘we have a right to disagree’, I could feel 100 mil Americans retching along with me Oh God no, never again.


6 posted on 01/14/2017 9:35:59 AM PST by txhurl (Break's over, kids, back to WAR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

One problem for her is that there long periods of time where she would disappear. Maybe due to health issues?

I wonder if something happened while she was Secretary of State and Benghazi was attacked. Maybe she was unavailable and it was too late when she reappeared. Scary to think that she might have been president.


7 posted on 01/14/2017 9:36:28 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

So Trump had no headlines in the tabloids?


8 posted on 01/14/2017 9:38:29 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

BREAKING!

Russians run Esquire.


9 posted on 01/14/2017 9:39:07 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Some of the headlines had to do with her husband cheating on her.

Were they untrue?

Why would they hurt Hillary's campaign, when they didn't undercut Bill's popularity?

Couldn't being considered a victim of a lousy husband have been an advantage for her?

Most of the headlines I remember had to do with her bad health.

What did she do to counteract the rumors?

Vigorous and energetic campaigning would have disproved the rumors.

That's exactly what she didn't do.

She could have addressed the stories, saying she was as fit as a bull moose or something like that.

But she didn't do that either.

10 posted on 01/14/2017 9:39:37 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Trump had MUCH more negative press. Just about every newspaper, ESPN, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Rolling Stone, Politico, Jet, Ebony, Fortune, USA Today, NY Times, LA Times, WaPo...


11 posted on 01/14/2017 9:40:30 AM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

14 posted on 01/14/2017 9:43:30 AM PST by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

It certainly changed my viewpoint.
Once I read that Hillary! had given birth
to an Alien baby, that was all she wrote.


15 posted on 01/14/2017 9:43:33 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
DAMN YOU BATBOY!





16 posted on 01/14/2017 9:44:12 AM PST by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Less than 60% of eligible voters even deigned to participate. Of those who vote, supposedly the 10% of voters that are swing voters decide all elections no matter the result, the ones that still manage to vote somehow but can be swayed one way or the other, by campaign ads, reported debate performance, physical appearance or some other non-rational reason. So basically the people with no firm guiding political philosophy decide our elections. If that’s true, it’s pretty amazing when you think about it.

Freegards


17 posted on 01/14/2017 9:45:28 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Well, they COULD be right: after all, people like us DO get most of our information from the pictures on the front pages of tabloid magazines while we wait in line to pay for our groceries. At least, I know I do.


20 posted on 01/14/2017 9:46:48 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I thought it was the

vast right wing conspiracy

vast alt right conspiracy

vast russian conspiracy.

Maybe it was a weak candidate who ran a weak campaign. Maybe it’s Clinton’s fault.


21 posted on 01/14/2017 9:46:55 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

LOL! I wonder how many libs had children who were horribly scarred when going past the magazine racks in the supermarkets - expect lawsuits in the near future....


23 posted on 01/14/2017 9:48:29 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

If she wasn’t a crook and her husband wasn’t a pervert the Clinton’s wouldn’t have been in the tabloids.


25 posted on 01/14/2017 9:51:22 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman; All
Hilliary LOST Because of Bad News Supermarket Tabloids.


28 posted on 01/14/2017 9:52:31 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

30 posted on 01/14/2017 9:53:05 AM PST by Flick Lives (Les Deplorables Triumphant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson