We use Ad Blocker Plus to protect our computer from hostile advertising sites/services that often push malware in their ads.
The way to deal with this is to place the ads as content in a site instead of using these annoying weblinks that stream crap to your computer and hog up all your bandwidth.
I've already run into this. You know what I do, I don't visit those websites. Screw 'em. If they're gonna be that way, I don't need them.
Ad blockers allow me to visit websites that are otherwise unusable. Some newspaper sites take 10 minutes to load a page without an ad blocker but take a few seconds with the ads suppressed.
It's my choice what I want to watch, not theirs.
The reason ad-blocker is necessary is because have you ever tried to access some of these websites on your cellphone and find it completely overtaken by ads? Enough said.
It allows me to not have to see an ad for every damn 1 minute video on YouTube.
This is a simple problem to solve.
Charge for access to your site. If people are not willing to pay for it, it’s not market-viable anyway. And should return to dust.
I have found a new browser called “Brave”. It annihilates ads and pop up. . It claims to have stopped over 100,000 ads since I installed it two months ago. This pleases me so much. It is a 95 mb program ( huge) and it is slightly slower but the damned thing works.
Also never watch any ads on FOX NEWS. We tape every show we like and watch 30 minutes later and zip through ads. We live in such a great age!! I didn’t watch a single ad on college football or any halftime. I watch an entire recorded game in under 1 hour. I hate Ads.
The ad people are like the Progressive elites, they think they know best and you have to put up with their crap.
When I go to a news page I don’t want to load a crap movie trailer for a movie I will never watch with no escape. If I were interested, I would click on it.
If web companies didn’t put in so many ads, and if the ad makers didn’t so frequently use crappy code, we wouldn’t use ad blockers. It’s just like telemarketing, when it was a minor irritant we accepted it, but once telemarketers started hitting everybody multiple times a day we started finding ways to block them. I had a lot of fun over election season blocking any number whose ID was just some city.
Maybe they should make better ads .... I never pass up a Budweiser dog and horse ad.
I also use and recommend Ad Block plus. I pay for Internet, and I go out of my way to blacklist any company whose ads occasionally sneak through. F ‘em!
Abusive ads are why there are ad blockers.
If ad blockers become universal in use then there will have to be fees to use the internet, either metered usage or fees per email and fees per page view. Something has to pay for it all. And yes, I do use an ad-blocker or the internet must be reduced to commercial sites i.e. entirely consisting of ads.
Netflix is a great example of how non-ad offerings to consumers can be successful. Netflix streams movies and TV series for a REASONABLE monthly fee, ad-free.
Netflix is adding members every month, whereas cable/satellite companies are losing members every month. The main reason? People are fed up with too many ads. A couple of years ago, the ‘industry’ added even more ads by shortening regular tv programs by another couple of minutes.
In the 1970s, and hour TV show had approximately 50 minutes of content. By the 1980s those shows had about 46 minutes of content. A few years ago, the content was down to 42 minutes, and now, many programs have been reduced to about 39 minutes.
Many people will pay for ‘good’ content, but they are infuriated by commercial concerns who try to sell both — a subscription fee and a website full of ads. That is why cable/satellite are losing customers — the massive subscription fees AND increasing ad contents.
I don’t want the added delay getting to my destination, the clogging of my computer buffer, having to close tons of windows once they are done, and the malware that creeps in.
Sorry, find a better way of achieving your goals folks.
Pop-up adds will never be welcome.
I have metered service via AT&T and a Straight Talk hotspot. Very satisfied with this arrangement.
I strenuously use Ad Block Plus when on the Internet for several reasons:
1. ABP may block malware via ads.
2. Some websites have videos that start was soon as the page loads. This uses my metered service whether I’m interested in the video or not. This pisses me off and I block these videos with Ad Block Plus. I also use ABP on sites where they load a lot of graphics.
3. Some websites, USA Today is one, trap that an ad blocker is being used and will not allow access to their site unless the ad blocker is turned off. My philosophy: I control the content that gets put on my computer, not the website owner. ESADS to sites like USA Today. Typically worthless content.
I use ad blockers. They make otherwise intolerable sites readable. I also don’t seem to get as many digital infections as I used to...
Compromise: Your side stops with the blaring, bleeping, instant video ads with pop-ups and malware and we’ll accept simple banners with no under ads, pop-up ads and no movement of any kind.
I don’t mind ads. I just don’t want ones that demand you take action to STOP it from doing what it wants to do *or* launches a video or makes any motion. I came to that page to see what I expected, not be drowned out by a bunch of competing noise, movement and video that hog bandwidth. This also goes for Twitter feeds.
These sites got too greedy. If they had ordinary ads that you had to click on if you were interested nobody would need adblock. But sites like Breitbart and numerous others run so many scripts that the page is unreadable without either disabling scripts or using an adblock. I can now look at their stories, I just didn’t click on them before.