Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88
Security issues and terrorism really have nothing to do with the relocation of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. These issues just come up every time a president defers the relocation under that silly 1995 law that allegedly mandates this embassy relocation.

There are actually two reasons for the ongoing refusal of U.S. presidents to authorize the relocation under that law:

1. Congress had no authority to mandate such a thing in the first place.

2. The U.S. government has a long-standing policy of keeping U.S. embassies out of disputed areas.

48 posted on 01/12/2017 2:47:55 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

All the territory of Israel is disputed for that matter. There are UN resolutions recognizing Israel and their right to their original territory of 1948, but there are those nations and groups which do not recognize that.

The status of the territory that changed hands after the 1967 war is in dispute, including Jerusalem. I guess each US government has to decide what it’s position on those territories will be. I don’t go along with any notion that everything Israel gained during that war should be returned to the aggressors who set off the war and intended to “drive the Jews into the sea”.

I believe if the executive and the legislative branches of the US government are in agreement (after 1/20/2017) to move the embassy to Jerusalem, then the authority definitely exists to do it.


49 posted on 01/12/2017 3:03:56 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson