Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Intelligence Agencies Have No Clothes
Liberty Blitzkrieg ^ | 10 January 2017 | Michael Krieger

Posted on 01/11/2017 2:59:32 PM PST by Lorianne

The true patriotism, the only rational patriotism is loyalty to the nation all the time, loyalty to the government when it deserves it.

– Mark Twain, The Czar’s Soliloquy”

At this point, pretty much everyone in America has seen the results of Hillary Clinton media pet, John Harwood’s recent Twitter poll.

Who do you believe America?

7:25 PM - 5 Jan 2017

83% Wikileaks

17% US intel officials

(Excerpt) Read more at libertyblitzkrieg.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: fakeintel; fakereport; media
I'd love to see what this poll is like now.
1 posted on 01/11/2017 2:59:32 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; monkapotamus
Tripwire Alert – The Intelligence Shadow War Final Act… The Last Refuge (The Conservative Treehouse) ^ | January 11, 2017 | sundance Posted on 1/11/2017, 2:29:57 PM by monkapotamus Much like the “2015/2016 GOPe Splitter Strategy”, the 2017 Intelligence Community “Shadow War” ends with an epic Donald Trump victory…. here’s the full monty. After closely watching the planning and forethought following Trump announced his candidacy, we stated in September 2015: […] Donald Trump, a serious student of the entire decades long game, is waging a 360° war against the entire DC apparatus, on every single level of its construct. And yes, that also means the monolithic media empire which facilitates all of the aforementioned usurpations. Donald Trump is campaigning against EVERY ADVERSE INTEREST to the U.S.A. This is the essential underpinning of the “Make America Great Again” campaign. Trump is not just taking on the construct of progressive ideology that has undermined the essence of American exceptionalism; Trump is not just exposing the immense number of faux-conservatives in media and political punditry; Trump is not just allowing us to see the scope of anti-American interest; no, he’s taking on the very selfish foundation they’ve all used to sell out our country. Heck, he’s taking on all the “Decepticons” simultaneously. Those adverse interests are both outside and inside our borders. He’s intent on tearing down the machine, all of it. By now that should be obvious to everyone. (more) Toward that end, today’s final exposure of the corrupt media, specifically CNN and Buzzfeed, surrounding the false intelligence reports they used to create a completely false narrative – brings the end to a series of events as transparent as the GOPe “splitter strategy” which preceded it. To fully understand what just took place, you must remind yourself of the visible shadow war which became abundantly evident several months ago: […] With General Mattis as Secretary of Defense, Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor, General John Kelly the Department of Homeland Security, a top-of-class West Point graduate in Mike Pompeo brought in to take over and undoubtedly purge the CIA, and a lame duck struggle breaking out over NSA with Admiral Mike Rogers, the implications are pretty obvious. […] The white hats we have needed within the national security and intelligence departments are responding from a very select group within the Defense Department. […] Mounting evidence supports the ongoing thesis that DoD has actually seceded from the political elites; and with the election of President Donald Trump, they are poised on the horizon to reconstruct a nationalist-minded defense, intelligence and security apparatus. This is the fundamental paradigm shift many have discussed, yet few imagined possible. (more) Slightly more than a week after winning the 2016 Presidential Election, the head of the NSA Cyber Command, Admiral Mike Rogers, went to New York and met with the new President-Elect Donald Trump inside Trump Tower. A month prior to that specific visit, DNI Director James Clapper advised President Obama to fire Admiral Mike Rogers. There is every indication, every reason to believe, that Admiral Rogers gave President-elect Donald Trump a very specific “head’s up“; warning the incoming president of actions which would be undertaken by political operatives within the intelligence community to undermine the construct of the incoming administration. All activity from that mid-November meeting through to now, points to Rogers giving advanced notice to Trump of a political intelligence scheme which culminated today with the public embarrassment of the those politicized intelligence agencies, operatives and their vessels for disinformation – the media. Following the meeting with Donald Trump, it clearly appears Admiral Mike Rogers went back into the matrix and, as an outcome of his position, followed orders – but did so with an arms length approach. The NSA (Rogers) did not support the political intelligence “high confidence” narrative as it was constructed by James Clapper (DNI) and John Brennan (CIA). We’ll never know what subtle action was taken, or not taken, by Rogers which ultimately culminated in a completely false assertion from “leakers” within the “intelligence community” about a fake report promoted by CNN. –SEE HERE– However, we can be certain the details of the claim by CNN was entirely disinformation -false information- perhaps intended to discover internal intelligence agency leakers/operatives. There never was an “addendum report” within the presidential intelligence briefing on Russia’s involvement, or any discussion of a ridiculous 35 page dossier. Both NBC and The Hill have now directly published articles which destroy the narrative assembled by CNN on the basis of their exclusive intelligence leaks: ♦ President-elect Donald Trump was never briefed on the allegations that Russian intelligence services have collected compromising information on him, according to NBC and Trump’s transition team. ♦ Officials prepared a two-page summary of unverified reports that have been circulating Capitol Hill for months in advance of their Friday meeting with Trump, an intelligence official told NBC, but never discussed it with him. ♦ The briefing was shared with Trump verbally, the report said, and no documents were left with the president-elect. (link) Against this backdrop, perhaps the “quiet FBI release” of documents and evidence surrounding the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton and Classified Documents also points to a similar intelligence approach…. ….”and then he pulled down their briefs and exposed their fake news”.. http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3513017/posts
2 posted on 01/11/2017 3:04:19 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The deadliest Islamic terror cell America has ever faced is leaving office, 20 Jan 2017!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

GWB should be pleased. No longer is everything bad his fault. Vlad did it.


3 posted on 01/11/2017 3:22:15 PM PST by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Except Assange clearly lied as Donald is saying indeed the source was Russia. His credibility is now destroyed.
4 posted on 01/11/2017 3:23:38 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Every department from the CIA/FBI down to the janitorial service needs to be gutted.


5 posted on 01/11/2017 3:33:44 PM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
Except Assange clearly lied as Donald is saying indeed the source was Russia. His credibility is now destroyed.

Hardly. Based on past performance my money would be on Trump making an innocent mistake before I'd bet against Assange.

6 posted on 01/11/2017 3:36:17 PM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

“Except Assange clearly lied as Donald is saying indeed the source was Russia”

Actually Assange said HIS source was not Russia or a state actor but an individual. He DID say he didn’t know how his source came about the leaks.


7 posted on 01/11/2017 3:41:40 PM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
Except Assange clearly lied as Donald is saying indeed the source was Russia.

Maybe Assange doesn't know who the hackers are.

He may only know know who passed them along to Wikileaks.

His credibility is now destroyed.

No more than anybody else in the media who doesn't reveal his sources (and that's assuming he knows who they are).

If he had to say exactly where every document came from (assuming he knows), nobody would bother leaking documents and his site would be out of business.

8 posted on 01/11/2017 3:59:17 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Mistake being that concluding it was Russia?


9 posted on 01/11/2017 4:05:08 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Castigar
Meaning Russia fed the leaks to someone who then fed it to Assange? That would be credible. It still paints a dark stain on Trump as we now have to ask why did Russia want him elected?
10 posted on 01/11/2017 4:06:12 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: x
OK, so Assange could simply be an unwitting actor in all this, indirectly funneling Russian hacking to the public.

Which means Russia are the villains in all this, and perhaps Trump needs to start distancing himself from Putin?

11 posted on 01/11/2017 4:09:58 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Weve got about 20 agencies and they all need fo be stripped to the bone.


12 posted on 01/11/2017 4:24:27 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

“It still paints a dark stain on Trump as we now have to ask why did Russia want him elected? “

Actually, to me it just means the didn’t want Hillary. And I’m TOTALLY on board with that.


13 posted on 01/11/2017 4:38:06 PM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Castigar

leave town


14 posted on 01/11/2017 4:45:20 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The only agent I want to see naked

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

15 posted on 01/11/2017 4:49:58 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

I’m not going to try to quantify a speculation.

I do know you don’t piss away a universally acknowledged reputation like Wikileaks has for transient reasons.


16 posted on 01/11/2017 5:02:11 PM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

“It still paints a dark stain on Trump as we now have to ask why did Russia want him elected? “

Actually, to me it just means the didn’t want Hillary. And I’m TOTALLY on board with that.


17 posted on 01/11/2017 6:28:29 PM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Castigar

Given the pitiful state of security, it is easy to say MANY people and states had access to these emails. Assange was clear that he did not receive them from Russia. If his agent was a Hillary/DNC insider who got them from Russia, then what was Hillary or the DNC doing colluding with Russians?


18 posted on 01/12/2017 11:47:12 AM PST by Bookwoman (...and I am unanimous in this...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Castigar

I am too as long as there wasn’t an actual agreement between Trump and Putin for Russia to release the emails. Like Putin expects Trump to deliver on something.

There is no evidence for that yet, but there will be speculation.


19 posted on 01/12/2017 1:49:42 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Castigar

Still ends don’t justify the means and I hope there wasn’t an agreement brokered between Putin and Trump.

And it still begs the issue why would Putin prefer Trump over Hillary? I don’t get that.


20 posted on 01/12/2017 1:52:39 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson