[mainestategop]

Takes one to know one comrades... They don’t hide their bias anymore. What a great time to be alive...

[Crooked Constituent]

That’s a convenient excuse. They needed an example of fake intelligence to teach the dumb rookie Trump the difference. The media disgust me.

[JBW1949]

I would say the intel weinies BETTER offer ALL their information to Trump in the future...Or update their resumes...

[Grampa Dave]

4 channel trolling the mediots, CIA, Rats, Intel Idiots, and McAnal.

[snarkytart]

“It was included should they feel they needed to explain to Mr. Trump the difference between analyzed intelligence and what they are calling ‘unvetted disinformation,'” she continued. “It was available for that purpose, and it never came up. Importantly, documents were never presented to Mr. Trump or his team.”

Yea okay. As if DJT needed to see that to know what disinformation looked like? Sure. Then why is it ATTACHED to a so-called 'real' report.

[Hatteras]

Yeah.. we knew all along it was fake... It was.... a TEST!, yeah...

[stars & stripes forever]

DRAIN THE SWAMP.

[Buckeye McFrog]

the takeaway: Our intelligence services are now at war with themselves. Interesting times.

[Cowboy Bob]

“A senior U.S. intelligence official who was involved in the preparation for the meeting tells NBC...

Aren't those discussions supposed to be SECRET????

[OpusatFR]

So how did CNN and Buzzdead get the 35 page “disinformation” report?

[WENDLE]

I have never seen an attempted character assassination hoax blow back this bad on the perpetrators in my life. This has gone off like a NUKE in their bed. CNN, the CIA and McCain are permanently maimed. This is not over for them. It has only just begun. Millions are coming to celebrate our victory inauguration. After this , I see thousand more on their way!!!!

[BookmanTheJanitor]

Uh: Doesn’t NBC Universal own BuzzFeed?

[Trump20162020]

The Dan Rather Bush National Guard document from 2004 looked more believable.

At least CBS sacked Rather for that. BuzzFeed will do squat, and dumb “progressives” on Twitter will keep regurgitating this obvious nonsense nonstop for years.

[Morpheus2009]

Take a look at how Trump responded to the Democrats calling him a rapist. How do you think Russian dirt will get a different result.

[God luvs America]

can someone explain this to us common folk?? thanks...

[tophat9000]

So they are saying the Intel briefers had a two-page sheet examples of “bullshit” (that just happen was all “bullshit” about Trump) so they could show Trump what “bullshit” intel looked like in case Trump did not know what “bullshit” intel looked like?

Yet some how this examples sheet of “bullshit” intel was given to the press any the forgot to stamp “total bullshit example” on it?

Seem to me the “example bullshit” story is also and example of bullshit

[RegulatorCountry]

Oh, so they didn’t inform Donald Trump of this scurrilous smear they were themselves peddling to the news media, because he was too stupid to know the difference?

These people are truly desperate. They have no idea how their excuses, deflections and rationalizations are coming across out here in the hinterlands. No clue whatsoever. Keep it up, lamp posts will start looking plausible.

[AmusedBystander]

Our intelligence services just showed they are NOT intelligent.

Jan 20th can't come soon enough.

[skimbell]

"...unvetted disinformation..."

AKA, Fake News.

[Gay State Conservative]

I'm embarrassed to admit that I'm having trouble following this story...the timeline in particular.Can someone explain what,if anything,this particular revelation means?