Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wash. Attorney General Begins Push for Gun Ban, Licensing
libertyparkpress.com ^ | Jan. 9, 2016 | Dave Workman

Posted on 01/09/2017 4:01:59 PM PST by PROCON

Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson apparently wants the Evergreen State to have gun laws similar to those in New York and Connecticut, according to the Yakima Herald, as he released details on bills to ban so-called “assault weapons” and require “enhanced” background checks for the purchase of such guns.

The measures may be read here and here.

“I believe a ban on the sale of assault weapons is the right policy for Washington, and I will keep fighting for that,” Ferguson said in a prepared statement, “I’ve said from the beginning that it would be an uphill battle. My alternative represents meaningful reform that will enhance public safety now.”

The bills are being sponsored by anti-gun Democrats in both the House and Senate. Senators David Frockt (D-Seattle) is sponsoring both bills in the Senate and Reps. Strom Peterson (D-Edmonds) and Laurie Jinkins (D-Tacoma) are each sponsoring one of the companion bills in the House.

One measure calls for a ban on assault weapons and magazines that hold more than ten cartridges, while a second bill would set a minimum age of 21 years to purchase a so-called “assault weapon” and require a license “to possess, manufacture, transport, purchase, distribute, import, sell, or offer to sell an assault weapon or large capacity magazine” in the state. To obtain the license, one must show proof of completion of a firearms safety course and “A full description of the safe gun storage the applicant will use to store the assault weapon when the assault weapon is not in their immediate possession and when the assault weapon is being transported …”

Ferguson predicted that the outright ban will face a tough fight in the Legislature, which opened Monday. However, many activists believe that these bills are merely designed to provide a political launch pad for a citizen initiative later this year or in 2018, coinciding with the mid-term elections in order to bring liberal anti-gun voters to the polls.

Both measures will face stiff opposition from gun owners who know that semi-auto firearms targeted by the legislation are involved in a fraction of homicides in Washington. According to the FBI Uniform Crime Report for 2015 – the most recent year for which data is available – rifles of any kind were identifiably involved in only three of the state’s 141 firearms-related murders.

The bill calling for an outright ban includes some handguns and rimfire rifles. Under that legislation the definitions of an “assault weapon” include:

A semiautomatic pistol, or a semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle with a fixed magazine, that has the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition; (c) A semiautomatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following: (i) Any feature capable of functioning as a protruding grip that can be held by the nontrigger hand; (ii) A threaded barrel, capable of accepting a flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer; (iii) A shroud attached to the barrel, or that partially or completely encircles the barrel, allowing the bearer to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned, but excluding a slide that encloses the barrel; or (iv) The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at any location outside of the pistol grip…


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: assaultweapons; banglist; gungrabbers; washag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: tumblindice

F**k the fudds. They chose their side.


21 posted on 01/09/2017 5:38:42 PM PST by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob

Yes the “registered” ranges is a question mark - that isn’t even a thing!

It does spell out that I can “transfer” my gun at a “registered” range to someone (anyone?) under 18 under my guidance (a son, student shooter, etc.). It also spells out that I can “transfer” it to my spouse - but only at a “registered” range - so plinking out in the woods would be illegal with my gun. Or letting my wife have my gun at home for protection while I am out of town. Under no circumstances am I allowed to “transfer” my gun to an adult other than my spouse - and then only at the “registered” range, or if she is under “imminent” need of it for self defense.

There isn’t any discussion about gunsmiths - or stores for that matter! It does not specify whether allowing someone to handle a weapon at the store counter would be legal or illegal. (Heh - like obabamare! “I’m sorry sir, you won’t know how that Remington 870 feels until you buy it.”)

Like others have said - it is all a moot point pretty much as nobody enforces it. Other than the online private sales. We can still do that, but have to run it though a gun shop to do the Federal paperwork and $40(?) fee.


22 posted on 01/09/2017 5:39:30 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Notice that the 3 sponsors are all from west of the Cascades which is overpopulated with freedom-hating libtards. Eastern Washington is pretty conservative. I live in north Idaho and I think we should form a new state consisting of most of Idaho, eastern Washington and Oregon, and NW Montana.


23 posted on 01/09/2017 6:24:33 PM PST by 43north (In the end, only kindness matters - except for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
I visited a relative in Seattle in the late 80's when weighing whether to relocate to the area. My cousin worked for Boeing at the time. I was considering Microsoft. My dad's aunt exclaimed "Dem's rule here". I expressed by condolences and struck the area off my list. What was unpalatable in 1991 is intolerable now. The government is corrupt.
24 posted on 01/09/2017 9:02:01 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Why do people continue to live in socialist places like this? If they want any freedom at all, why stay?


25 posted on 01/09/2017 9:04:47 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; I celebrated; I'm good. Let's get on with the civil war now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM

Only a narrow coastal slice of CA, OR and WA fit your stereotype.


26 posted on 01/09/2017 9:13:54 PM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 43north
There is a proposal to annex WA and OR east of the Cascades to Idaho. Similar political and work ethic. Mostly ranches and farms like most of Idaho. It would come with addition House districts moved to Idaho. Still weighing the merits.
27 posted on 01/09/2017 9:17:22 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Lots of WA cops buying land over there...we will out vote those suckers!


28 posted on 01/09/2017 11:51:59 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Repeal & replace Obamacare, tax reform, fix infrastructure, fixin military, Israel, kill enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/MT/122863756_zpid/35_rid/waterfront_att/53.722716,-98.569336,36.597889,-128.583985_rect/4_zm/0_mmm/

Here’s a nice 4 bedroom home in Montana. Only about $100,000.
.
.
.
.
Estimated mortgage - per month!


29 posted on 01/09/2017 11:57:32 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Too close to the neighbors and not enough land.

20 acres minimum, cannot see or hear neighbors homes from my porch, 30 minute drive to a reasonably sized city, no home on it yet (will build waht I want) and either a year yound stream or some body of water on the property so wildlife will be around.

I have my eye on some lots....cannot tell ya where yet but it will be western or south centrally located...nothing in Eastern Montana. Do not want to be living without treed land.


30 posted on 01/10/2017 12:13:52 AM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Repeal & replace Obamacare, tax reform, fix infrastructure, fixin military, Israel, kill enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

That place has 21 acres. Just tear down the existing home and build to your liking! Although with only a 1/4 mile of lakefront - the neighbors probably are too close.

I look at the places and dream sometimes. A small creek, some land and maybe an existing shack draws my eye.


31 posted on 01/10/2017 12:30:41 AM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
We left for northern Michigan two years ago. It was a huge decrease in property price and cost of living. It is far more beautiful here than anything in Washington state.

Guns are just part of life here as everyone hunts and fishes. Humidity is so low that the snow is powder and we rarely use anything other than brooms to clean our cars. You gotta like snow to be here, but we have four distinct seasons and lots of sun!! Crystal clear lakes and rivers, and blue ribbon fishing.

Auto insurance is quite pricey here however and property taxes are about the same.

32 posted on 01/10/2017 7:01:58 AM PST by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

If you don’t mind living on an old mining claim you can have your dream of acreage a shack and they throw in some toxic runoff for free.


33 posted on 01/10/2017 8:09:28 AM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Repeal & replace Obamacare, tax reform, fix infrastructure, fixin military, Israel, kill enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson