And they think the world would be better off with women running it.
To wit, Hillary, these crones, Merkel, pp ceo and board,...
An overwhelming share of Americans—69 percent of voters including 56 percent of Republicans—support Planned Parenthood
___________________________________________
Was this poll done by the same people that had Hitlery up by 12 points a week before the election?
Get my tax dollars out of the baby killing business. Defund Planned Parenthood.
I understand that men can be scum and not live up to their responsibilities. But I have never understood how a woman can kill the life growing inside her.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
So Ryan was actually wrong to support the Omnibus spending bill which provided funding for abortions imo.
Hypothetically speaking, given the constitutional division of federal and state powers, the founders would have probably expected the Senate to kill any House appropriations bill that provided federal funds to help pay for abortions.
Note that, unlike the rights that the states have expressly amended the Constitution to expressly protect, such right evidenced by the Bill of Rights and other rights amendments, the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the so-called right to have an abortion.
In other words, the state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices who decided Roe v. Wade against the states wrongly stole state powers and used those powers to establish from the bench the fictitious constitutional right to have an abortion.
Doing so opened the door for corrupt lawmakers to exploit likewise low-information women in the following way. Lawmakers used the 19th Amendment, in conunction with the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, to get themselves elected with the promise of providing federal abortion funding, such women evidently not understanding that the fed have no express constitutional authority to tax and spend for abortion purposes as evidenced by the Gibbons excerpt above.
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Noting that the primaries probably start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way. Patriots need to ask candidates why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I (to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.)
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the following Supreme Court clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers, starting again with the Gibbons excerpt.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Note that such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices off of the bench.
bkmk