Posted on 01/06/2017 7:36:36 PM PST by ColdOne
>>Jeb Bush was insulted and humiliated constantly by Trump. As much as i enjoyed watching, why would anyone think Bush would ever show any respect for Trump again?
***************************************************
Yes, he was. Unlike the Clintons, Jeb remains true to his true feelings.
Jeb Bush was exposed for the arrogant, ignorant son of a firmly-entrenched political dynasty.
It was masterfully done, by the Master’s anointed one, a true work of Art.
It was petty and immature for a person running for candidate, as was his personal taxes on the other republicans. You might get off on it. I don’t
It was the same way with GW back in the early 2000s. Some of us even got banned for calling him Jorge and El Presidente on the illegal immigration threads.
For me, it was not a matter of “getting off” on it. It was not petty. It was a brilliant strategic chess move. He sized up the opposition, and figured out the best way to meet and overcome the competition.
Fighting the Bush dynasty is no small feat. It took brains. courage, personal wealth, and God’s Hand. Sarah tried but lacked some of these components.
They threw everything they had at him, and lost. He was the first person to successfully overcome their choke hold on power.
I won’t discount any of his tactics, as I see it as a beautiful tapestry of genius strategical and blessed moves toward the end goal of vanquishing evil.
( don’t discount Trump’s victory and am glad of it. But what I said about Him and J. Bush was accurate and it explains why the Bushes and Trump are not going to be house guests soon.
>>But what I said about Him and J. Bush was accurate and it explains why the Bushes and Trump are not going to be house guests soon.
******************************************************
Of course the Bushes and Trumps “aren’t going to be house guests soon”. One represents American Values (Trump), while the other is the poster boy for One World Socialism.
Bush spent mega-dollars in an attempt to destroy Trump. Trump was much too kind to him, but our Donald is a nice guy, after all.
: )
My conclusion is it it plain old rudeness that splits them not the difference in values. If you think Trump was kind to him, then we have nothing further to discuss. Your definition of kind is something with which I am not familiar.
I understand your reaction. A very old friend had the same reaction. So many in the MSM relentlessly criticized him for what they categorized as his “tone”.
Yet, what they fail to see, is that it IS “kind” to expose their evil in this manner in order to successfully vanquish it.
DJT himself reveals he never makes the “first strike”. If you recall, cocky Bush mocked him when DJT first announced his candidacy. Before the first debate, Bush ran a very nasty ad, and made repeated disparaging remarks against Trump. That was beyond “rude”.
Trump hits back, and thank God he does. It was what was necessary in order to finally and successfully take down the Bush dynasty. No one or nothing else had heretofore been successful. A “kinder, gentler” tone always fails to defeat the Tyrant.
He fought fire with fire, and won.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.