Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul Will Oppose Republican Budget Resolution Against Obamacare
The Washington Post ^ | January 4, 2017 | David Weigel

Posted on 01/04/2017 4:24:37 PM PST by JeepersFreepers

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) will oppose the Republican budget resolution designed to begin the process of unwinding the Affordable Care Act, making him possibly the only member of the majority to break ranks.

In a speech scheduled for later Wednesday, he will criticize the resolution for assuming $9 trillion in additional debt over the next 10 years.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 115th; aca; gope; justrepeal; libertarian; obamacare; randpaul; repeal; repealandnotreplace; repealandreplace; trumpagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: reasonisfaith

Exactly. It is the ONLY solution to virtually every problem we have. Someone needs to take a stand for it. If it were up to me, everything would be privatized from schools to the police.


41 posted on 01/04/2017 8:10:14 PM PST by delete306
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cba123

No. He voted against increasing the debt.


42 posted on 01/04/2017 8:27:11 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

You had me at, ‘profligacy.’ ;)


43 posted on 01/04/2017 8:33:41 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

They should use healthcare reform as a chance for bipartisan agreement. It’s a live grenade. If Republicans do what the left-wing statists did and ram it down the countries throat without any compromises or deals then it will explode in their face just like Obamacare.

Trade healthcare reform for something more important.


44 posted on 01/04/2017 8:43:54 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I prefer to drink a bunch of them. Stay thirsty my FRiends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers; flaglady47; Maine Mariner; Bob Ireland; ExTexasRedhead; entropy12; danamco; ...
Failed 2016 presidential candidate Rand Paul is a rather tiny man (5'7, 157 lbs.)...but with a HUGE Napoleonic complex and drive.

Ignored and forgotten by the media and public for months, he's now decided to be a rogue Republican to get back into the limelight.

He's a flaky fruitcake Libertarian which he masks very well with his calm and measured smooth-talking, his earnest demeanor and his boyish appearance. Inside his head is a feverish brain working constantly at self-promotion.

I hope President-Elect Trump slaps this twerp upside, downside and sideways....and consigns him to Elba for the remainder of his term.

Leni

45 posted on 01/04/2017 9:01:55 PM PST by MinuteGal (GO TRUMP !!!.......GO PENCE !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celerity

He’s sorta like the GOP equivalent of Jim Trafficant.


46 posted on 01/04/2017 9:02:32 PM PST by gogeo (But he's not a conserrrrrvative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

That’s the dirty little not-so-secret of DC: Republicans are just as drunk on spending as Dems. Hence, more trillions in debt to come.

A lot of these guys are joyful because they see it as their chance to spend, not to reduce the size of government.

It remains to be seen whether Trump makes the connection that the solution to a lot of the domestic problems he cares about is to slash government and devolve more power to the states - and, even if he does, whether the pigs at the trough in Congress will go along.


47 posted on 01/04/2017 9:33:23 PM PST by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: guido911; All

Didn’t Trump start out as a kind of gadfly?


48 posted on 01/05/2017 12:29:12 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Why is THIS Congress assuming an EXTRA $9 TRILLION in debt for the next number of years?

Why? Because this is Washington and it will be business as usual. Nothing is going to change.

They will keep wasting our money, cheating us at every turn and keep selling off pieces of America.

Elections will fix nothing. Until we have a few hanging from crosses or good old solid oak limbs it will be business as usual.

49 posted on 01/05/2017 2:13:37 AM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Like it or not, it has to be done in pieces. So does immigration.

Yep - doing it like pulling off a band-aid and the Dims will control everything 4 years from now.

50 posted on 01/05/2017 4:11:00 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Drago
I said that, instead of complete repeal, the GOP "could keep some of the deficit-reducers" in Obamacare. The article you linked agrees with that statement.

The CNBC explanation appears to be correct as to the specific matter that Rand Paul was voting on. My impression is that it was to pave the way for total repeal, which would increase the deficit. Paul's point seems to be that he doesn't want a deficit increase now with a possibility of reduction later (a reduction that would come if they re-enact some parts of Obamacare).

That Conservative Review article you linked is very informative about what kind of betrayal we should watch for from the Republicans in Congress.
51 posted on 01/05/2017 4:13:45 AM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

The FACT is if this Congress does nothing the debt increases by $9T over the next 10 years anyway.
The Watch is on for Obama’s $20T debt before he leaves office....
https://www.fms.treas.gov/fmsweb/viewDTSFiles?dir=w&fname=17010300.pdf
We that close....


52 posted on 01/05/2017 4:40:47 AM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

Agreed.. can’t trust anyone.


53 posted on 01/05/2017 5:08:41 AM PST by momincombatboots (Pray for Sky, 20, two gunshots to abdomen, college student, hostess, easy prey n transformed US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I agree. I want to know why getting rid of OCare will cost a trillion dollars a year.

That strikes me as crazy.

If I get rid of my car payment, I owe them $0.00 dollars thereafter.


54 posted on 01/05/2017 5:10:42 AM PST by xzins (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

He is an eye doctor, and I’m sure there’s something in that Obamacare fiasco that benefits him. It’s why I didn’t like the candidates in the past elections pushing themselves as “doctors” and claiming to be conservative. Something in it for them.


55 posted on 01/05/2017 5:20:51 AM PST by chemicalman (People who enjoy meetings should not be in charge of anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guido911

Rand is shifty and opportunistic pretending to be a libertarian. Always has been that way.


56 posted on 01/05/2017 6:46:17 AM PST by bjcoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Well, with your analogy, just because you get rid of your car (and your car payment), you still need a means to get to work. So replacing your car payment with uber fare or bus fare will still cost more than $0.00. If Congress was in charge of your situation they would replace it with a chauffeured limo, instead. :-)

Congress needs to come out and explain just what the 9 trillion additional spending is for and how they plan to justify such expenditures. Have they learned nothing from this election?


57 posted on 01/05/2017 7:01:00 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The bill includes setting the stage for repealing Obamacare but it does so in the context of the overall budget. The $9 trillion is the amount of additional public debt that the Republicans expect to incur over the next ten years (”additional” meaning it’s added to the debt already incurred). Obamacare is only a part of that.


58 posted on 01/05/2017 7:04:19 AM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Trump utterly demolished Rand Paul during this debate exchange.

The senator is just holding a petty grudge.

59 posted on 01/05/2017 7:37:21 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Trump utterly demolished Rand Paul during this debate exchange.

The senator is just holding a petty grudge.

===================================================

Anyone with an IQ much above dirt would oppose a debt increase. The population of NOT DUMB people does NOT include the majority of Republicans in Congress.

60 posted on 01/05/2017 7:58:11 AM PST by politicianslie (What would a terrorist do if he were made POTUS? : Exactly what Hussein Obama is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson