[Sacajaweau]

About time. Ridiculous that if I travel, I have to leave my personal protection at home.

[WildHighlander57]

Mega-dittoes!!!!

[SandRat]

That’a good start but still a long way to go.

[Ancesthntr]

“About time. Ridiculous that if I travel, I have to leave my personal protection at home.”

---

I agree 100%. 2 summers ago, the family and I traveled from TX to NJ, then down to DC on the way to FL, and then home. I carried everywhere but in DC (we stayed in MD, and only went to the Smithsonian during daylight hours). I had to break laws in MD and NJ just to be able to protect my wife, kids and myself from people who don’t hesitate to break a myriad of laws to steal my stuff. ENOUGH of that crap! If marriage MUST be recognized across state lines, then so much a specifically-enumerated right.

Now that this part of the rollback of the Prison-State has started, I’m waiting for the Hearing Protection Act and the proposed elimination of the 1986 prohibition on civilian ownership of post-’86 full autos. I’ll believe that the Congress is serious when these are not just proposed, but passed and signed into law.

[JimRed]

How does that help residents of states in which only the “connected” are able to obtain a permit? There should be a corollary allowing states to issue permits to out-of-state gun owners, whose home states would then be required to honor those permits!

But since any licensing or permit requirement is a clear infringement anyway, it is only a step towards constitutional carry.