As mentioned in related threads, please consider the following about former Speaker Pelosi’s unconstitutional Obamacare.
Regardless what lawless Obama’s state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices want everybody to think about the constitutionality of Obamacare, Pelosi, Reid (17th Amendment) and lawless Obama not only irresponsibly rammed unconstitutional Obamacare through the system without letting lawmakers read it (insanity), but Pelosi violated her oath to protect and defend the Constitution by blanantly ignoring the following.
Pelosi wrongly ignored a repeatedly proposed House resolution to propose a necessary healthcare amendement to the Constitution to the states for ratification.
"Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding the right of citizens of the United States to health care of equal high quality." —H. J. Res. 30.
So the anti-constitutional republic Washington cartel wrongly established Obamacare without the required consent of the Constitution’s Article V state supermajority, one of many such social spending programs established since the time of the FDR Administatration.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Patriots need to support Trump in putting a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes (Gibbons opinion above). Once unconstitutional federal taxes are stopped then the states will probably find a tsunami of new revenues that they won’t know what to do with, each state establishing its own healthcare program for starters.
"The States should be left to do whatever acts they can do as well as the General Government.” —Thomas Jefferson to John Harvie, 1790.
And should the states ultimately decide that the feds have a “magic wand” to run a national healthcare program better than the states can, then there is nothing stopping the states from amending the Constitution to grant the feds such powers.
On the other hand, if Trump and patriots fail to completely drain the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp with Trumpcare and many existing federal spending programs, many programs based on stolen state powers and associated stolen state revenues, then it is only a matter of time before another lawless president again works in cahoots with corrupt Congress to steal state powers, using those stolen powers to oppress the sovereign states and their citizens.
Below are a few more healthcare-related excerpts from case opinions decided by previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting justices. The excerpts help to clarify that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for INTRAstate healthcare purposes.
With respect to the Obamacare mandate which institutionally indoctrinated justices wrongy declared to be constitutional imo, note the second entry in the list, the excerpt from Paul v. Virginia. In that case the Court had clarified that the feds have no Commerce Clause power to regulate insurance regardless if an insurance policy is negotiated across state borders.
"Inspection laws, quarantine laws, health laws of every description [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c., are component parts of this mass." - Justice Barbour, New York v. Miln., 1837.
"4. The issuing of a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce [emphasis added] within the meaning of the latter of the two clauses, even though the parties be domiciled in different States, but is a simple contract of indemnity against loss." - Paul v. Virginia, 1869. (The corrupt feds have no Commerce Clause (1.8.3) power to regulate insurance.)
"Direct control of medical practice in the states is obviously [emphases added] beyond the power of Congress." - Linder v. United States, 1925.
WELL SAID!