Posted on 12/29/2016 3:13:57 PM PST by fwdude
Link only for posting restrictions.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
BWAHAHAA. Blowback is a bitch!
Well, they can’t have their cake and eat it too.
If they don’t cover unmarried “domestic partners” of the opposite sex, then they can’t be intellectually honest, and say they demand coverage of same for same sex partners. Now that same-sex can get married, they need to get married to get these benefits. What’s fair is fair.
The Children of Table 34 (complete film)
Here's a summary of film, for those who don't want to take the time to watch it: The Children of Table 34 – Alfred Kinsey’s pedophile-based research
And: Alfred Kinsey and the children of table 34
This -- along with the Penn State Sandusky scandal -- is what makes THe Big 10 the truly historical "let's sanction & protect Pedophiles" conference...
Truly an embarrassment in USA history that continues to this very hour!
HOORAY Indiana
The fact completely escaped me that this was Kinsey’s stomping grounds. What a turd.
Sweet! How many of these fools will now get married and end up paying alimony to their former c**ksucker.
From having been a student there from 1977 to 1981, I can say that I was somehow immune to all of this. Maybe I was the antidote.
Earth needs another round of pillars of salt.
I would say that it is more than intellectual honesty - it would be discrimination to provide coverage for unmarried gays but not unmarried heterosexuals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.