[PROCON]

.. a wide ranging discussion about Trump's business and personal entanglements, which some experts have cited as being fraught with potential conflicts with his new role..

Uh-huh, where were these same 'Experts' when Hillary and the Clinton Foundation were raking in millions when she served as Sec. of State?

*crickets*

Trump is making the expected and proper arrangements.

[COBOL2Java]

We can expect Hillary to pontificate on this turn of events, telling the sycophantic interviewer "It's the best way to handle these situations."

Of course, no one in the media will draw any parallels to the way in which things were done in the Clinton Foundation.

[Sacajaweau]

This may help as evidence when they go after Hillary....and I’m sure they will....and the wikileaks make them their own witness.

[Parmy]

which some experts have cited as being fraught with potential conflicts with...

I learned a long time ago that an expert was just an "x" with a "pert" behind it.

[FormerACLUmember]

Trump’s charity = 100% to worthy causes = crooked media outroar

Clinton’s Fake Charity = 5% to the needy = a criminal slush fund + Praise from the mainstream media

[Safrguns]

Ok... so Trump has to dissolve HIS charity foundation just because it APPEARS it could be abused for pay to play etc....

And Hillary’s foundation WAS used for pay to play and nobody talks about it in the news.

Go figure.

[DoughtyOne]

And yet the Clintons still run their foundation, the one nobody thought could be a conflict of interest.

[Mr. K]

I don’t recall any of them being concerned about The Clinton foundation (that was accepting bribes- I mean donations while she was running the state department)

[Hotlanta Mike]

A precursor to prosecuting the Clinton Crime Foundation...

[facedown]

...which has been embroiled in an ongoing controversy over potential conflicts of interest as he prepares to enter the Oval Office.

Only by the Alinskyites.