Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434

You do have a point and it’s a good one.

But somehow, maybe in a vision I had, I see that this resolution may be the one that breaks the ‘Camel’s back’. We may see the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S. during the next four years. And really now... without the U.S. paying for the U.N. there will soon be no more U.N.

In many ways I see the whole thing unraveling like Maggie Thatcher once famously said, “Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples’ money [to spend].” The U.N. relies on Other People’s Money and Other People’s Armies to do their ‘good’ works. Without either of those two then it is just a glorified debating society leading back to my comment about “Words... Just words.”


76 posted on 12/24/2016 3:52:09 PM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: The Working Man

my only disagreement is that the nations that are in the UN are wealthy mulsim oil country nations- they don’t contribute money because We’ve been stupid enough to carry the UN but if we withdraw=- they may just pour their own money from their vast wealth into it-


79 posted on 12/24/2016 4:17:48 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson