Posted on 12/24/2016 4:04:51 AM PST by marktwain
I note that you're being rather adamant about a possibility that is rather unlikely given the circumstance, so it appears as if you've made conclusions of your own.
It was a justifiable shooting in my opinion and likely in the opinion of any who witnessed it, however it would have been odd for such a confrontation to have occurred in front of a Deputy Sherriff, wouldn’t you say?
I've owned guns that fit that description.
“Shat” implies less than lethal velocity, although some might disagree after a bout of salmonella. Maybe “spat” works better.
I was thinking about guns that wouldn’t group worth a darn.
That makes sense. Sort of a buckshot scatter.
Incorrect. In my original post I stated that the article is ambiguous, and does not support any conclusion regarding culpability of the shooter for the incident. That is my basis for debate - that we DO NOT KNOW.
What you or I THINK is immaterial to the truth.
Merry Christmas, FRiend.
We were swangin’
Jon Anderson
Swing, swang, swung. Remember?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.