Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We are going to be treated to this insanity for the next four and hopefully eight years.
1 posted on 12/17/2016 6:46:37 AM PST by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Cheerio

Why can’t he simply put his properties in a “family trust,” like Bill and Hillary did?


2 posted on 12/17/2016 6:48:32 AM PST by Steely Tom ([VOTE FRAUD] == [CIVIL WAR])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Dims. are such sorry ass losers. Like we didn’t already know this. The country would flourish to unreal heights without them here.


3 posted on 12/17/2016 6:49:11 AM PST by mothball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

But they had no problem at all with the Clinton Crime Family Trust getting 25 million dollars from a Saud prince. Can you say hypocrites? Sure you can.


4 posted on 12/17/2016 6:50:02 AM PST by BipolarBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Memo to Democrats: you are in the minority. You ain’t passing squat. Even if McVain and Linda Graham side with you, it ain’t getting past the House. Anyone with a brain realizes this is all grandstanding.


5 posted on 12/17/2016 6:50:10 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

They can’t force anything. They don’t have the votes to pass squat.


6 posted on 12/17/2016 6:50:22 AM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

2nd rate small potatoes house flipper Warren is just jealous that the Big Chief’s lodges are so much more than any teepee she’s ever dealt with.


8 posted on 12/17/2016 6:51:16 AM PST by To Hell With Poverty (I support a woman's right to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Another example that clearly shows that DemocRATS could vaporize tomorrow and America would only benefit from it. There would be no loss to America.


9 posted on 12/17/2016 6:53:02 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio
Why wait until Inaugeration? Start the Impeachment hearings NOW.

Then, identify who might someday be a Republican President, and start Impeachment on some 12 year old boy from Kansas.

You know you want to.

10 posted on 12/17/2016 6:53:37 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP LIED TO ME!!!! ....He said I'd get sick of winning.... AND I'M NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

So they want to make up rules after he’s elected? Why didn’t the rules apply to everyone else?

This POS bitch can eat #%&* and die. She is the reason we have to DRAIN THE SWAMP.

They’re in no ways interested in doing anything to help the American people. It’s all about playing politics to gain power.


11 posted on 12/17/2016 6:54:17 AM PST by boycott (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio
Uhhhhhh, a question from the back of the FEMA Re-Education Camp?

Wouldn't this bill have to pass Congress first or has Fakeagewea be imbued with some sort of Congressional super-power?

I'll see myself to the delousing shower first and take my answer off the air.

12 posted on 12/17/2016 6:54:55 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standairds at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Yeah this bill will make it through the senate

Sarc

Of course add a rider making all the congress subject to the same rules


14 posted on 12/17/2016 6:55:56 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio
In fact, you leftist freaks should start Impeachment hearings on every single man, woman, and child in America.

Then if one of them tries to become President for the Democrat side, you can say, "This is OLD NEWS."

On the other hand, if one of them tries to become President for the Republican side, you can say, "There's no way he/she should be President! They've already been impeached!"

15 posted on 12/17/2016 6:55:58 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP LIED TO ME!!!! ....He said I'd get sick of winning.... AND I'M NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

The ‘Rat legislative agenda for 2017 B funny. They should all run away to Cuba in protest.


16 posted on 12/17/2016 6:56:16 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

I thing their best strategy is to just Pre-Impeach him, so he’ll never be able to take office. Just get it over with.


17 posted on 12/17/2016 6:56:26 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

....guess Pocahontas opened her campaign for 2020.


18 posted on 12/17/2016 6:56:34 AM PST by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Surely now The Donald shall be worried well into the late evening hours. < /sarcasm >

Where do these people get this stuff? Business interests only need to be set aside for the period of time any President occupies the office, and any judgment calls that do not directly favor those business interests to a greater degree than ALL similar interests are favored, but based on transparent and unbiased decisions, should not be held against the greater good.

No such thing as a truly “blind trust” is plausible or even possible.


19 posted on 12/17/2016 6:56:49 AM PST by alloysteel (It is OK to use the greeting "Merry Christmas" again. Happy birthday, Jesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Surely now The Donald shall be worried well into the late evening hours. < /sarcasm >

Where do these people get this stuff? Business interests only need to be set aside for the period of time any President occupies the office, and any judgment calls that do not directly favor those business interests to a greater degree than ALL similar interests are favored, but based on transparent and unbiased decisions, should not be held against the greater good.

No such thing as a truly “blind trust” is plausible or even possible.


23 posted on 12/17/2016 6:58:27 AM PST by alloysteel (It is OK to use the greeting "Merry Christmas" again. Happy birthday, Jesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Dishonest injun


24 posted on 12/17/2016 6:58:35 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio

Trump should turn this on them. Aren’t congress critters just as vulnerable to conflicts of interest? All of them should divest themselves of their FAMILY’S business holdings or leave office. They will drop this subject like vampires drop a cross dipped in holy water.


25 posted on 12/17/2016 6:58:56 AM PST by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cheerio
Ever since Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in last month’s presidential election, liberals have been whining about how “unfair” this result is.

Why are Liberals like a bunch of five year olds?

“Mommy the team picked Donny and not me! That’s not FAIR!”

The more time passes the more immature the Democrats become.

It also seems to me that the Republicans in government encourage this behavior. They constantly give in to the Democrats demands. It is like when a five year old whines that he wants a cookie instead of the broccoli on his plate and you let him have it just to shut him up.

What happens the next time you serve him broccoli?

In my experience as time has passed the Democrats demands have become more and more ridiculous and their demeanor more and more shrill.

The Democrats are very much like a bunch of spoiled five year olds.

26 posted on 12/17/2016 6:59:41 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson