I just watched a few minutes of that ridiculous video.
Their first point was wrong about the copy paste.
Those old typewriters had a habit of typing out of horizontal alignment. Especially with using the shift key and typing quickly.
The word Oahu on Obama’s, the O was almost in superscript. The supposed source document was much closer in alignment. Yet they say they are exact matches.
Maybe my eyes were playing tricks on me but I don’t think so. Also the O is lighter in color.
BOGUS!!!
Ya, you know more than the two forensic agencies they hired to do the investigation, sure.
[I just watched a few minutes of that ridiculous video.]
What video are you speaking of- the documentary in the presser?
That wasn't even brought up as a point in the demonstration.
The point was that the exact misalignment was the same on both documents which were written days apart.
Not BOGUS.
Back in the day, many people examined the BC and pointed out in various videos and photos all the various layers, cut & paste jobs, and non typewriter characters etc.
It was established beyond ANY doubt to anyone with a brain that the documents Obama presented were manipulated, forged or faked whichever word you choose.
You obamaroid/dnc kneepads are too tight ...
Excellent observation!
I am one who has posted here on FR about the fraudulent nature of the supposed Obama long-form BC almost immediately after it was proffered. (E.g. here) I continue to believe that image is bogus.
So the question really is: What is Arpaio up to? Who or what are his Italy and Hawaii document examiners? What about Corsi? Are these people part of a disinformation hoax, not too different from those who offered us tales about Vince Foster's day trips to Switzerland.
ML/NJ
Yes you are. Dozens of other technicians have pointed out how this fraudulent document was produced.