‘I think the reason this current document is so easily discerned as a fake is because the States do not normally devote a great deal of effort to make their fake documents look perfect. In normal circumstances they are only intended to fool the child who looks at it, or the authorities that might need it for some legal matter short of the Presidency.
The state does not devote much time to making it look like a perfect fake because in the vast majority of cases this is unnecessary. Fake birth documents produced by a state agency were never intended to withstand the scrutiny that would be brought to bear regarding the office of the presidency, and of course it’s faults and inconsistencies were quickly ferreted out.’
That is an excellent analysis. I had assumed the klutziness of the doc was due to the rush of putting it together so quickly (to stop the bleeding, once Trump’s spotlighting of the issue began to seriously undermine Obama’s credibility). Your explanation makes more sense.
Bookmarking.
It does, but you can't get many people to seriously consider it. Most of them prefer to believe it's some mad forging conspiracy from the deep dark halls of the Illuminati sweatshops. Ordinary Hawaiian State employee kludgery simply doesn't have any pizazz.
I think the Cold Case Posse has long been on a wild goose chase and for some reason deliberately ignored the obvious. The Document Obama has presented is a legally valid, albeit fake document created by the State of Hawaii in accordance with the normal process for creating replacement birth certificates.
But it's not his real birth certificate. We have yet to see that, if he even has a real one.