Posted on 12/15/2016 7:19:19 AM PST by Perseverando
BECAUSE THEY ARE COWARDS!!!!!!!
No, I believe they are in England and Europe as invading conquerors (hijrah), and being well paid for it with lots of free government bennies for them and their families. And if that's not enough of an enticement to invade Europe, then the Brits, Germans, Swedes, etc are making their women and children readily available too.
Good points.
Only problem is, guns and knives are outlawed in Britain. Guess they
ll have to go back to fighting with clubs and pitchforks.
There is no Allah but Satan, and Muhammad was his murdering pedophile.
Your son is right.
If you look at the figures, the large budget cuts introduced by Cameron and Osborne, which affected most government spending departments, not just Defence, had little to do with immigration. In fact the net fiscal cost of immigration (benefits etc balanced against taxes etc paid by working immigrants) is relatively marginal. The reason the welfare budget has proved so difficult to keep down is greater life expectancy and an ageing population, since welfare spending is domninated by benefits to the elderly (the state pension alone accounts for 47%).
Very few British Muslims originate from Syria, even fewer are ‘refugees’ from the recent fighting. The UK refused to participate in the Merkel-inspired plan to distribute Syrian refugees throughout the EU: and since the UK is not in the Schengen open-borders area, Syrian refugees elsewhere in the EU can’t get into Britain (except illegally) - hence the notorious ‘jungle’ camp in Calais (now removed) of would-be immigrants to Britian stuck the other side of the Channel.
Hogwash. Feeding, clothing, medical, housing, schooling, and special items for large populations of ‘asians’ or any other variety is an expense in the many billions for any government. Of course it dramatically effects the budget. That is on top of the citizens already there and their needs.
I don't think sending them all to an Italian restaurant in New York City is the solution.
Or is there another meaning of TRE that a web search is ignorant of?...
Fiscal Impacts of Migration to the UK
Because there is no accepted common standard for the criteria used in these studies, the conclusions vary widely, some showing net benefit, some net cost. But even the most pessimistic shows a net cost of £29.7 billion, which is about 3.6% of total public expenditure.
Correction - the £29.7bn is for a ten-year period , so for a single year the cost on that analysis is less than 0.4% of public expenditure.
And for that the UK becomes a muslim nation without a military.
And that made my point ...
Target rich environment.
*forehead smack* Of course!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.