[Almondjoy]

So you are saying that you can’t make a law that says you can’t bring a gun into your house with or without your permission yes? So private property doesn’t matter at all? The framers thought it would be perfectly ok for you to run around wherever you wanted on any property you wanted with a gun on your side?

[arthurus]

I am saying that a property owner can tell someone he must not bring a gun onto his property but that he cannot then constitutionally remove that person for that reason. If he wishes to remove the person he has to tell him to leave. If he doesn't leave he can be removed for trespassing because he was told to leave. I said it is a fine distinction but it is a valid one. If you do not understand fine distinctions and the nuances of law, well, I can't help you there and you just have to stay convinced that I hate your private property. Well, so be it.

[arthurus]

I am saying that a property owner can tell someone he must not bring a gun onto his property but that he cannot then constitutionally remove that person for that reason. If he wishes to remove the person he has to tell him to leave. If he doesn't leave he can be removed for trespassing because he was told to leave. I said it is a fine distinction but it is a valid one. If you do not understand fine distinctions and the nuances of law, well, I can't help you there and you just have to stay convinced that I hate your private property. Well, so be it.