Is it time for President Trump in 2017 to end the CIA?
President Truman did not trust the OSS and its increasing power.
At the end of WWII, he signed an ExO ending the OSS.
September 20, 1945, President Truman signed Executive Order 9621, terminating the OSS. His Order became effective October 1, 1945. In the days following, the functions of the OSS were split between the Department of State and the Department of War.
The State Department received the Research and Analysis Branch of OSS (originally created by Edward Mead Earle[28]) which was renamed the Interim Research and Intelligence Service or IRIS,[29] headed by U.S. Army Colonel Alfred McCormack. Later it was renamed the Bureau of Intelligence and Research by the State
Department.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Strategic_Services
I remember Julian Assange stating that the source was NOT a foreign government, and that there would be surprise if the source was ever known.
This leads me to think it was someone inside the DNC, so they might not really want to find out how this information got out there.
Just like the “recount”; be careful what you wish for....
Bump!
The DNC e-mails were most likely leaked by Seth Rich.
The questions about his murder are what they are trying to obfuscate.
WkikLeaks doesn't 'share' a lot but they also don't lie to us. I tend to take them at their word. Not so with the Washington Post or New York Times.
This is getting so out of control.
I believe we are at a tipping point.
The msm has completely bought into this, and has fully committed their last breaths on this issue. If this is shown to be a nothing burger, which it is, the msm will lose all what little credibility they have left. Therefore, they have to go the complete distance. They have to get Trump removed.
Similarly, the CIA has fully staked their reputation on this. If this is shown to be a nothing burger, which it is, then the CIA will lose all credibility. The CIA has allowed or promoted this to spiral out of control. Therefore, they have to go the complete distance. They have to get Trump removed.
So this is a dangerous time.
This is the msm last gasping breath for relevance. And the CIA is pushing it.
They have no way out but to get Trump removed.
So the biggest purveyors of “fake news” are the NYT and the WP. Wow. Who knew?
This new phrase, “fake news”, which everyone is using.. is political correct for “lies”. It softens the truth and makes it sound like something other than a LIE.
It was appalling from the getgo that the media had “CIA sources”. How pathetic and dangerous is it that their useful idiots in the media can so easily be exploited? And McCain and Graham? They’ve now been totally exposed as tools.
A twitter user in Syria that I have grown to trust over the past few years told me yesterday that ISIS has retaken Palmyra and capture huge amounts of military equipment (tanks & heavy armor) from Assad’s Army. Several hundred killed solders in Assad’s army. The number is still disputed, but I have seen absolutely nothing in the press anywhere about it.
The reality on the ground is that Erdogan’s Turkish Army has captured and is holding large parts of Iraq and Syria with NO intentions to ever give it up. Other players are involved, I am sure Obama is a part of it.
Someone in the CIA realized that attacking an incoming US president with fake news is likely to get the entire CIA canned.
The Twitter account in Syria that I mentioned also told me that at least 25 Kurd Twitter accounts of users in Syria have been hacked and taken over. It is possible that this is being done by Turkey, but I frankly doubt that. I suspect Obozo’s minions are doing it.
We in the US are being lied to daily about what the real agenda in Syria is. They are acting now, because they know this will end when Trump is in office.
So, in all this noise about the Russians altering the election, I’d like to know exactly how...
1. The Russians told Hillary to assume Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to be slam-dunk wins, while engaging in ill-advised fantasies about capturing red states.
2. The Russians persuaded Hillary to demonize and alienate half the electorate as “deplorable” and “irredeemable.”
3. The Russians told Hillary not to use a Secure Internet Protocol Network (SIPRNet) account while SecState.
4. The Russians told her to lie about the cause to the faces of the families of the four Americans killed in the terror attacks in Benghazi.
5. The Russians persuaded her to run, without a single discernible accomplishment to her name.
6. The Russians cajoled her into engaging in illegal “pay for play” schemes involving the Clinton Foundation and foreign figures wanting special access to the Obama administration.
Easy Pesy. March the CIA director up to the hill for a talk with Trey.
If there was anything I learned from the Wikileaks emails (besides the fact Podesta likes “pizza”), is the media is in collusion with the DNC.
The other interesting thing is Wikileaks was very under reported by the media, but now those hacked emails are supposed to be the main determinant of the election?
Oh, please.
If anything, I would believe that the Russian government paid wikileaks for the data. as did the Chinese, Israelis, British, Germans, French.....