[Ray76]

Where’s the evidence? Innuendo and suspicion is not evidence.

[jsanders2001]

> Where’s the evidence? Innuendo and suspicion is not evidence.

The MSM is pushing the narrative that the CIA has determined/b> that Russia meddled led with the election saying that they allowed the Wikileaks from Assange to pass through their servers as proof. So I gues with that logic any servers that the Wikileaks posts went to are guilty as well, right. So I guess Yahoo or MSN is guilty of conspiring with the Nigerians to steal millions from me everytime I receive a 419 email eh? Sounds legit..../s

[jsanders2001]

> Where’s the evidence? Innuendo and suspicion is not evidence.

The MSM is pushing the narrative that the CIA has determined that Russia meddled led with the election saying that they allowed the Wikileaks from Assange to pass through their servers as proof. So I gues with that logic any servers that the Wikileaks posts went to are guilty as well, right. So I guess Yahoo or MSN is guilty of conspiring with the Nigerians to steal millions from me everytime I receive a 419 email eh? Sounds legit..../s

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Show me one ballot box connected to a phone line.

[dearolddad]

Where’s the evidence? Innuendo and suspicion is not evidence.

Unless you are a lib or a democrat.