Posted on 12/09/2016 1:16:39 PM PST by detective
Megyn Kelly has been incredibly consistent. There isn’t a single shift she’s made in the minimal ideology of hers that comes through on her show. Her show is not an ideological show. To the extent you can pin down her political views through her show, she appears to think and feel exactly the same now as when she first appeared on Fox. She is a “soft libertarian” like a lot of suburban, educated women. She is very skeptical of big government and has fairly liberal views on social issues.
I never watched fox news until I had a room mate who watched fox news. During lunch he would watch and it was Megyn Kelly. She’s very easy on the eyes but I never paid much attention to broadcast of cable news. Low and behold I tool a flight and sat right next to her. She seemed quite pleasant AND without exaggerating, she nearly ripped my hand off with her freaking out over some mild turbulence. It was either out of Dallas or Newark. I forget which direction. This was 2010 or so... She was pleasant and friendly.
Now, seeing what’s happening, it just goes to show power and fame will change people. It takes a strong constitution for people to remain humble in the face of fame, money, and power. To name drop... When I was flat broke I took some labor jobs and ended up doing stone work (yes, stacking rocks in a garden) at a house in SoCal. It was James Woods’ new house. EVERY morning he came out to say hello and thank us for the hard work we are all doing.
LOL, there isn’t a host out there more conservative than Mark Levin. If you don’t know that, you don’t know the meaning of the word “conservative.”
Megyn Kelly makes Megyn Kelly sound like a tramp:
Howard Stern asks whether she would marry O’Reilly, Hannity, or Beck if she had to marry one of the three. Kelly chooses Hannity because he’s the richest (even though she’s a multi-millionaire and so are all three men). What kind of wealthy woman is that driven by having even more money?
She never condemned Trump for anything.
She asked him a question related to his greatest vulnerability as a candidate, the flaw that eventually hurt his poll numbers more than anything else. It is the number one duty of any journalist in a primary to fully vet each candidate. She correctly brought to light what proved to be the single biggest risk about nominating Trump, his history of controversial recorded comments about women.
I can imagine a lot of amusing choices and reasons, but marrying for money with her income struck me wrong. I don’t see the humor in playing to that stereotype.
They need a smart woman with the savvy of Tucker Carlson who can intelligently take on Liberals and show them to be the loons that they are.
I refuse to listen to Dana Loesch after what she did in Indy on WIBC. She may advocate for the 2nd Amendment but she laid in bed with the wrong people mainly Beck and Kelly. Loesch should have stuck to her guns (no pun intended) and climbed the ladder on her terms instead of trying to shortcut the venture. Loesch and Kelly I see as rising together in different ways but with the same outcome - they will fall even harder. I can’t stand the whining Loeasch does on her program. I used to listen to her after Rush on WIBC but when the radio station had a listener vote for Rush or Loesch every left wing nut job called in for Loesch. I switch over to WEND when Rush is on. WIBC needs to get better talent as well. Katz is okay Garrison is a never Trumper but because Trump won he acts as if he is for Trump. It’s pathetic. Chicks on the Right are just fun entertainment. Send Loesch back to whence she came from and send Kelly a packin’ with the good ole pink slip. She is female and she likes the color pink!
I have big problems with the cheese cake photo shown of Kelly. It reveals more than a poor cheese cake attempt. It reveals her character: A subject who maybe was too hard to deal with in working with the photographer to get the right shot. The head is at the wrong angle, Kelly’s left arm is too strained, her right hand looks like eagle talons with the right elbow too clinched to her side. The hue was toned down to wash out her natural skin tone in an attempt to blend in with the back drop tone. Her lips could have had a stronger red tone which makes her look like she just had the blood sucked out of her by Count Dracula. That black dress with its creases and bands around her mid section look like a metal shell encasing more plumpness than Kelly wants to reveal. The dress is flawed further with a jagged, unfinished, hem line.
My summary: The photo reveals the flawed character of Megyn Kelly. Where ever she goes, people will realize her flaws and they will get less than picture perfect as she goes on with a jagged, unfinished, hem line.
LOL! And a look that says “Sniff and enjoy!”
Amen, and take Juan Williams too!
She’s mean as a junk yard dog - to everyone. She has no loyalty and no honor or ethics, imo.
I was a FoxAcholic for years and really enjoyed Megyn, but about two months before the primary began I noticed a real left tilt which actually made me think about all the hints of her real character I had ignored.
I took her out of my daily record list and will never put her back in.
You seem to be a loan defender.
No...It says, “come and pay me”
Levin and Beck are not dummies except for their insane Trump derangement syndrome. I rarely listen to either of them anymore, not because I think they are stupid but because they can't speak more that ten minutes with out bringing up something they hate about Trump. Not unlike the I like Sarah but crowd that still reside here...
Trump won, some of the #NeverTrump crowd better figure out why.
This looks photoshopped.
It’s a GQ photo. Of course it’s photoshopped.
How would I know that? I never hear him talk about anything conservative. All he does is bash Trump.
Laura Ingraham or Monica Crowley..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.