Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid Defends Senate Rule Change: 'What Was Fair for President Obama Is Fair for Trump'(T)
cnsnews.com ^ | 12/8/2016 | Susan Jones

Posted on 12/08/2016 8:30:10 AM PST by rktman

Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, writing in Thursday's New York Times [1], says he has "a few things to say," now that he's leaving the Senate for good.

Reid devoted half of his op-ed to a defense of the Senate rule change he instituted in 2013. The so-called "nuclear option" will allow confirmation of Donald Trump's nominees (except for the Supreme Court) by a simple 51-vote majority. It eliminates the filibuster.

"One thing we fought for that’s worth defending is a fairer, more open and more productive Senate," Reid wrote. "We changed the Senate rules to guarantee a president’s nominees a fair, simple-majority vote, and declared that a president’s nominees should not be stymied with procedural hurdles and a requirement for supermajority votes.

"We declared that the changes should apply regardless of which party was in the White House, because fair votes are what democracy is all about. I doubt any of us envisioned Donald J. Trump’s becoming the first president to take office under the new rules. But what was fair for President Obama is fair for President Trump."

Reid called the rule change a "victory" for a "functioning, open and transparent Senate."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: trumpstillwinning; trumpwinsagain; what
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: BRL

He must have an extreme fever. Delirious


41 posted on 12/08/2016 10:05:22 AM PST by V K Lee (Is it too early for a President Trump?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36

Only one way he will be gone, gone. Until then, he’ll be pulling katherine mantos strings when she replaces him shortly.


42 posted on 12/08/2016 10:08:21 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Is he in a coffin as yet?


43 posted on 12/08/2016 10:17:57 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Also, he is a moron.


44 posted on 12/08/2016 10:18:58 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Most rickety tick, IMO


45 posted on 12/08/2016 10:39:01 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The ONLY reason that Reid did not unilaterally abolish Supreme Court filibusters is because there were no vacancies on the Court at the time.

The ONLY reason that Reid did not unilaterally abolish legislative filibusters is because the Republicans controlled the House and could easily block any legislation that Reid pushed through the Senate on a Democrat party line vote.

I just wish that McConnell had any balls and would unilaterally abolish Supreme Court and legislative filibusters now when it would do us some good. It was called the nuclear option for a reason. When the other side unloads their nukes on you the correct response is to unload your nukes on them, not let them rebuild and hope that they won’t do it again.


46 posted on 12/08/2016 12:24:40 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (Ding Dong the Witch is Dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Watching Harry makes me reconsider my stand on partial birth abortion.


47 posted on 12/08/2016 3:37:02 PM PST by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dearolddad
Hmmmm. Late (real late) term abortion in his case. 😷
48 posted on 12/08/2016 4:04:59 PM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson