Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

The judge could be even more honest about his feelings and simply rule that Hillary won the election based on polls, with the actual vote proving fraud.

It wouldn’t stand, of course, but it would be refreshingly honest of him...


71 posted on 12/07/2016 9:09:38 AM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of infants, ruled by their emotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

“Hillary won the election based on polls”

That is essentially the argument one doofus made - contesting the FL results:
http://satprnews.com/2016/12/07/lawyer-files-lawsuit-contesting-florida-presidential-election/


73 posted on 12/07/2016 9:14:22 AM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

Hehehe! That’s a good one


74 posted on 12/07/2016 9:15:35 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

And since those are his feelings, he might as well under mandamus order the “inferior” court ruling to be ignored and the recount continue. Because he clearly feels that federal law is superior in this case, states rights and election laws be damned. Say it and everyone can get on with the appeal.


76 posted on 12/07/2016 9:17:31 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson