Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeganC

“Police officers may only conduct a search following a traffic stop if they believe there is probable cause a crime was committed”

Finally, a California court rules correctly on something. Now just rule that bringing in a “drug dog” to sniff around your car to pretend to give you probable cause is itself a search, and we’ll be getting somewhere.


4 posted on 12/06/2016 12:05:20 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

>>Now just rule that bringing in a “drug dog” to sniff around your car to pretend to give you probable cause is itself a search, and we’ll be getting somewhere.

Whether it is a search or not, I don’t think this rises to the level of an unreasonable search IF it is conducted on property that is controlled by the state OR the property owner has given the police permission to do this. If a dog gets a whiff at a locker at a school, that’s fine.

Whipping out a dog anywhere you want to do this is a completely different matter.


21 posted on 12/06/2016 12:29:49 PM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson