Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Trump administration stop Lockheed from building F-16s in India?
Star-Telegram ^ | DECEMBER 5, 2016 | STEVE KASKOVICH

Posted on 12/06/2016 3:59:12 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Earlier this year, Lockheed Martin offered to shift manufacturing of F-16 fighter jets from Fort Worth to India if it wins a big contract to build hundreds of planes for the country.

Now some are wondering whether the Trump administration will allow such a deal to proceed.

“What will be the U.S. policy posture now that the new president-elect is in the mix?” one high-level official at an American defense firm in India told The Washington Post, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “Is he going to continue the policy of engaging in India on co-production and co-development? All of those are unknown at this point.”

President-elect Trump is threatening to penalize companies that shift manufacturing operations overseas. He made his point again last week after traveling to Indiana to announce a deal with Carrier to keep about 1,000 jobs in Indiana that were headed to Mexico in exchange for millions in state tax breaks.

The Post reports that India wants to co-produce fighter jets as part of an initiative to expand its manufacturing base. Lockheed is seen as competing with Sweden’s Gripen fighter and Boeing’s F/A-18 for the Indian contract. The actual process of selecting a jet hasn’t started yet.

Lockheed has been winding down F-16 production in Fort Worth for several years as resources have shifted to the growing F-35 program. Still workers are concerned.

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/news/business/article119041913.html#storylink=cpy

(Excerpt) Read more at star-telegram.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; india; lockheedmartin; trump

1 posted on 12/06/2016 3:59:12 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

build them here in the USA!


2 posted on 12/06/2016 4:10:34 AM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Almost as dumb as outsourcing the IRS to chinese hackers


3 posted on 12/06/2016 4:15:31 AM PST by ari-freedom (Chicken Little Concerned for Trump people are almost as annoying as NeverTrumpers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Yes, these should be strictly built in the US. Keep these jobs in the US.


4 posted on 12/06/2016 4:17:46 AM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp: Replace Ryan & McConnell; Primary Lyn' Ted and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Seems I read a few years back that some Indian law requires that some percentage of manufacturing must be done in India if you want to cut a deal to import whatever it is you are pitching. Maybe I have that wrong, it sure makes industrial espionage easy peasy.
5 posted on 12/06/2016 4:23:46 AM PST by DAC21 (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine
From the article:
"Lockheed is seen as competing with Sweden’s Gripen fighter and Boeing’s F/A-18 for the Indian contract."

Building the aircraft in India would be a huge advantage for Lockheed (or Boeing) in this competition. What if the Swedes decide to build in India and Lockheed is prohibited from doing so? That could easily tip the balance in the Swede's favor. That's not going to help Ft. Worth one bit.

And, for all we know, it might be a requirement of the Indian competition.

If I were Trump I would just get out of the way.

6 posted on 12/06/2016 4:27:04 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Ideally, they should be built here. But if the planes in question are for the Indian military, then it might make sense to assemble them in India (as long as the profits are taxed here).

However, I don’t want one single aircraft intended for use by the United States military to be constructed in India.


7 posted on 12/06/2016 4:29:03 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

The planes can be built in India if sold on the world market


8 posted on 12/06/2016 4:31:38 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Still workers are concerned.”
Our whole nation should be concerned. Why are we even considering this extortion. Per one of your own past articles, they want to co-produce jet engines too. Why in hell are we considering shoehorning their whole aerospace industry. That includes years of material science and development of Hastelloy, the various grades of Inconel, etc. The material properties information alone would move their industry ahead by decades. Absolute stupidity and not in the interest of our nation.


9 posted on 12/06/2016 5:03:28 AM PST by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OftheOhio

The answer of course is China. India as an ally against China would finally contain that growing beast. India isn’t quite up to the task now but getting them a modern air force is a good start. Moving the F-16 plant is a good deal, we are or are about to stop accepting new ones for us and the choice was build them there or not build them at all. India would have gone to a competitor.

Now I don’t know about the engine’s, but if it is the case they would have to bite the bullet and pay a ridiculous price for native built engines’ as they wont have an economy of scale there. It’s also a separate deal them the frames


10 posted on 12/06/2016 5:52:30 AM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

Not so easy.
These aren’t fighters that will be built in India and imported into the US. They’re fighters to be used by India.

When the US was contracting for the Beretta M9 pistol, or the next generation Air Force Tanker, there were stipulations that those systems had to be built in America. We still have the Berry Amendment to allow the purchases of materials and equipment made in America.

Why wouldn’t India want the same?


11 posted on 12/06/2016 6:06:47 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

Really. I mean, why not? If India wants our planes-—and apparently it took them about 20 years to design and build a crappy battle tank-—then we build them.


12 posted on 12/06/2016 6:07:28 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

some assembly required in india?

lettum put the tires on.


13 posted on 12/06/2016 6:36:42 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS

It depends, if it was just about selling a plane, then we should build it here. In this case however, India not only wants a plane, and they want to “co-produce” it. This usually means buy some direct from us, then once the factory is up and running, build it in India.

The question is do we want then to buy our design or someone else’s? The F-16 is a venerable but capable design that we are no longer buying for ourselves (a mistake in my mind, but beside the point).

We get the sale of the design and probably a few aircraft out of the deal. Otherwise someone else does. I see this as a win-win. We get to make a few extra aircraft we otherwise would not make, they get to improve their capabilities.


14 posted on 12/06/2016 6:43:31 AM PST by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

“Seems I read a few years back that some Indian law requires that some percentage of manufacturing must be done in India”

Ok, they can do the upholstery.


15 posted on 12/06/2016 7:12:31 AM PST by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

A couple of points here-

Trump cancelled the $23 Million order for a new Air Force 1- and I’m willing to bet that he has HIS OWN plane repainted or keeps using the current plane.

Secondly- With all the Muslims in India, how could you build such a sensitive war plane in that country? The technology won’t stay within the walls of the factory, IMO.

Boeing is making a mistake here—Trump or no Trump.


16 posted on 12/06/2016 8:11:57 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Raymann

It’s not only the F-16 and not only India. It’s a lose-lose situation for the nation and our own aerospace manufacturing base.
India keen to buy F/A 18 Super Hornet fighter jets for IAF
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3413041/posts?page=1
US to help India develop engine for Gen-5 fighter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3371587/posts?page=1


17 posted on 12/06/2016 8:13:32 AM PST by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

The F-16 has been built by a Muslim nation before: Turkey and probably a dozen Muslim nations operate it (Iraq, Turkey, Oman, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia ...).


18 posted on 12/06/2016 9:26:39 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Yes. If I were Trump, I would sit out on this one. The Swedes or French will grab the deal for sale of 100’s of these planes. And we would’ve lost a counter to China.


19 posted on 12/06/2016 5:52:57 PM PST by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Most of those who commented are under the impression that there is an option here. There really isn't. If the U.S. wants to even compete in the contract to supply to the Indian Air Force for this particular requirement, this (building in India) is a prerequisite. It's either that or no order.
20 posted on 12/07/2016 5:22:56 AM PST by cold start
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson