Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House G.O.P. Signals Break With Trump Over Tariff Threat
New York Times ^ | December 5, 2016 | JENNIFER STEINHAUER

Posted on 12/06/2016 1:29:12 AM PST by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Enlightened1; All

Yup. It is unfortunate that the historically-challenged who consider themselves economic geniuses are uninformed.


21 posted on 12/06/2016 2:33:57 AM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

No. It would create a domestic incentive for effective competing products, save American jobs and promote American businesses. Paul Ryan and McCarthy are two towering pieces of s***, who will work to undermine Trump at every turn. They are self-centered ghouls sucking the lifeblood of America and AMERICANS in return for campaign handouts from the crony capitalist global corporations which seek liquidation of our borders. Boh of these POS’s should be supporting their party’s choice as president, NOT UDERMINING him. Both McCarthy and Ryan are allies if that other damn POS John Boehner, who did everything possible to make the nightmare of the Obama years even worse,

And I am sick and tired of damn Never Trumpers supporting these idiots. Trump represents a movement not a political party and that movement destroyed the Democrats just ad it will destroy the feckless, pusillanimous Republican establishment represented by these two QUISLINGS.


22 posted on 12/06/2016 2:55:51 AM PST by ZULU (We are freedom's safest place!!!! #BOYCOTT HAMILTON!!! #BOYCOTT NEW YORK CITY!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This slimy guy has been attacking Trump at everybturn. He is a Never Trumper or a Democrat troll. Anybody who quotes the New York Times as a reputable source of criticism of Trump is no “Reagan”naut.

Troll he is.


23 posted on 12/06/2016 2:58:35 AM PST by ZULU (We are freedom's safest place!!!! #BOYCOTT HAMILTON!!! #BOYCOTT NEW YORK CITY!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
> A 35% tax on imports would raise prices for consumers and hurt many manufacturers that use imports in their products. It would also start a trade war that would cost jobs in export industries.

35 % is a bit high. There would definitely be price increases to offset the tariffs. He may want to take a look at this issue from different perspectives and look for better tactics.

24 posted on 12/06/2016 3:05:30 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Like the other establishmentarians the GOP believes in a fantasy known as a ‘free market’. It doesn’t exist.


25 posted on 12/06/2016 3:16:45 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Yeah, isn’t that something. They are sniveling cowards with Obama. Now suddenly they got balls with a republican coming in.


26 posted on 12/06/2016 3:22:16 AM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
“I don’t want to get into some kind of trade war,” Representative Kevin McCarthy

Trade war with whom ? This tax isn't on a foreign company exporting to the US - such as Chinese company selling their products in the US. It is on a US based company bringing their goods back into the US.

27 posted on 12/06/2016 3:22:21 AM PST by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
A 35% tax on imports would raise prices.

Oh c'mon. Think of all the high end, designer label, celebrity endorsed merchandise that comes from worker hellholes. The workers endure near slave conditions while elitists, including those involved in global transportation, reap the profits.

28 posted on 12/06/2016 3:33:18 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
35 % is a bit high. There would definitely be price increases to offset the tariffs. He may want to take a look at this issue from different perspectives and look for better tactics.

A tariff is a Federal tax paid by consumers. It takes money out our pockets and sends it to Washington D.C.T'm not a fan. Neither was Milton Friedman.

But it promotes job growth in this country in the areas directly affected by the tariff. However there will be a loss of buying power in the hands of the general public with all that money going to Washington D.C. This will depress sales and therefore employment in other areas. (We won't need as many HDTV salesman if we put a tariff on the import of Chinese and Korean TVs.) OTOH, we will need to add staff at the Treasury department to keep track of the tariff schedules and collections.

So there are pluses and there are minuses. Looking at just the positive aspects of the Trump Tariff Policy is a big mistake but the opposite is true as well.

I think Trump will get some power to try out his tariff ideas. But I seriously doubt that he will get his 35%. I would bet on something closer to 10% with some typical restrictions that Congress just loves to put on everything they touch.

An interesting experiment. We'll see how it turns out. I hope it proves successful but I'm really not confident that it will. Tax reductions and the elimination of oppressive rules and regulations will (IMHO) have a much bigger impact on the economy and employment.

29 posted on 12/06/2016 3:33:58 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Whatever those ridiculous RINO’s want Trump needs to do the opposite as a general rule!


30 posted on 12/06/2016 3:40:14 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

They think they are right because a tariff is a tax and they don’t want to get into raising taxes.

It has to be part of a total plan thar includes tax cuts. We wouldn’t get anywhere if they only passes this tariff


31 posted on 12/06/2016 3:48:59 AM PST by ari-freedom (Chicken Little Concerned for Trump people are almost as annoying as NeverTrumpers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

The tariff is on American companies that try to have it both ways, not south korean TV’s.


32 posted on 12/06/2016 3:52:50 AM PST by ari-freedom (Chicken Little Concerned for Trump people are almost as annoying as NeverTrumpers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

“But I seriously doubt that he will get his 35%”

He can do it with the stroke of a pen.


33 posted on 12/06/2016 4:04:16 AM PST by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

The tariff is on American companies that try to have it both ways, not south korean TV’s.
++++
I suppose you are correct about that but the principle still holds. There will be winners, losers and it will be the American public that pays the tariff.


34 posted on 12/06/2016 4:08:37 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

He can do it with the stroke of a pen.
++++
Are you really sure about that? Can you provide a reference?


35 posted on 12/06/2016 4:11:43 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
The president doesn’t need permission from congress to impose tariffs or withdraw from trade deals.

Correct, he needs legislation.

36 posted on 12/06/2016 4:14:37 AM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“A 35% tax on imports would raise prices for consumers and hurt many manufacturers that use imports in their products.”

Good.

“It would also start a trade war that would cost jobs in export industries.”

The phrase “trade war” has been thrown at us for decades & we lost 70,000 manufacturing plants in the process.

I’m all for short term pain for long term gain. Goodness knows the status quo is 100% unacceptable.


37 posted on 12/06/2016 4:16:16 AM PST by TheStickman (And their fear tastes like sunshine puked up by a unicorn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

These are American companies. You cannot have a trade war with companies in your own country. Kevin McCarthy is slow.


38 posted on 12/06/2016 4:20:09 AM PST by franklog (#NeverCruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Obama slapped a 35% tariff on Chinese tires not too long ago. Presidents have the power to do it unilaterally. Still waiting for the trade war.


39 posted on 12/06/2016 4:23:54 AM PST by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“he needs legislation.”

Incorrect.


40 posted on 12/06/2016 4:24:27 AM PST by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson