“original election results stand.”
If your premise that no state recount can be done because of Detroit’s errors stands, fantastic.
BUT
If not, the recount continues elsewhere, and the precincts where most of the fraudulent voting occurred remains counted (Detroit).
Those precincts said their scanners were broken and they in some cases scanned the ballots multiple times. So, if actually hand recounted Hillary would actually received a lot fewer votes in those precincts, and Trump’s total would grow.
Unfortunately, if those votes “stand” as originally counted, fraudulent counts for Hillary remain, and shenanigans can happen elsewhere.
does anyone have a clarification?
Interesting point because wasn’t this the reason why the Supreme Court stepped in ruled in Florida in 2000.
Consistency and fairness — how can you recount only in counties that are favorable to one party or the other. And then, how can you insure that the count is truly accurate after the ballots have been handled over and over and over again.