Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

Does this mean that there was tampering with votes? If so, what is the rationale for not recounting?


14 posted on 12/05/2016 1:35:04 PM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: djpg

It’s state law.


26 posted on 12/05/2016 1:52:18 PM PST by MarMema (thank you President elect Trump for all you have done!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: djpg
(b) The number of ballots to be recounted and the number of ballots issued on election day as shown on the poll list or the computer printout do not match and the difference is not explained to the satisfaction of the board of canvassers.

https://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(dho1ds45nhb4jt452rgcli45))/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-116-1954-XXXIII.pdf

30 posted on 12/05/2016 1:58:10 PM PST by MarMema (thank you President elect Trump for all you have done!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: djpg

I think the rationale is “you only get to cheat once”.
Deos seem like this would call for a challenge or audit at least.


31 posted on 12/05/2016 1:58:22 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson