I have two problems with that. First, MI law allows a recount request from an “aggrieved” candidate. Somehow we have skipped over the process of determining whether Mz. Stein is aggrieved or not. Second, it allows for a request for a recount, but not to designate what type of recount will be performed. How is she able to demand a “hand recount” by law?
I do not understand how either occurred. She should have been stopped at “aggrieved.” She was not close enough to either candidate to be “aggrieved.” SHE is aggrieving.
sorry, I can’t do anything about the fact that
Michigan lawmakers are not very bright.
‘aggrieved’, means anything or nothing.
so it doesn’t stop a frivolous claim.
IF the law does not specify things,
losing candidates will ask for the sky.
the new reality
is that there is no civility left.
Republicans need to realize that fact,
and grow up