Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kevin McCarthy won’t defend Donald Trump’s 35-percent tariff
Washington Times ^ | Monday, December 5, 2016 | Tom Howell Jr.

Posted on 12/05/2016 9:46:23 AM PST by GonzoII

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy on Monday refused to back President-elect Donald Trump’s push for a 35-percent tariff on companies that move operations abroad and then sell their goods back in the United States, saying corporate tax reform is the key to retaining American jobs.

“I think that’s a better way to solve the problem than getting in a trade war over a 35-percent tariff,” the California Republican told reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kevinmccarthy; tariffs; trade; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Meet the New Boss

It’s disgusting, command economy, central planning to have someone like Denninger sit in his ivory tower and slap taxes on products as he sees fit to achieve phony, made-up goals like “parity” or “equality.”

This is called having know-nothing know-it-alls attempt to control everything everybody does to achieve their megalomaniacal fantasies about what an economy should be. This is what Obama does with his EPA and other regulatory agencies.

Not only is making such rules evil to begin with, but EVEN IF they made some kind of economic sense at the time they were written, the economy is a shifting, dynamic enterprise. The numbers that seem right on one day will always shift into a completely different calculation on the next day. Which is why trying to put static controls on a dynamic economy results in a collapsed economy where you can’t even buy toilet paper.

Send this statist, commie BS back to DU or a Bernie Sanders forums.


41 posted on 12/05/2016 11:37:50 AM PST by JediJones (We must deport all liberals until we can figure out what the hell is going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Which is a policy that makes no sense in the long run. It may stop job cuts, but an expanding company could simply build all their new factories overseas.

An economy is an expression of human freedom. It cannot be controlled by the whims of megalomaniacal central planners of either the Sanders or Trump variety. Insane regulations and taxes simply force people to find creative ways around it or go underground.

If it makes economic sense to produce something in another country, then it will be done and it should be done. The consumer is king. Products are not produced for the purpose of giving people salaries and benefits. Labor costs are a necessary evil. Ideally all products would be made without having to pay ANYONE anything to make them.


42 posted on 12/05/2016 11:43:34 AM PST by JediJones (We must deport all liberals until we can figure out what the hell is going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I heard Preibus make an interesting statement this weekend on some news show. He said that the US taxes every export but has no taxes on any import. I did a double take at the tv, did I hear that right? If so we have to be the absolute stupidest people on the planet.

Fair trade is the ticket. If it is no fees, no taxes, not one penny for a country to send something into the US, then I expect the same terms if we send something into their country.

McCarthy is just doing the bidding of his owners the Chamber of Crony Commerce. He’s their slave along with most of the GOPE.


43 posted on 12/05/2016 11:59:49 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

“Lord, give your people some backbone!”

There’s a difference between “backbone” and wasting your time on exercises in futility.


44 posted on 12/05/2016 12:07:50 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy on his knees before an army of unzipped Chamber of Commerce “leadership” treasonweasels having a hell of a good time one by one as usual. McCarthy is apparently highly skilled and quite experienced. Next up on the knee pads: Treasonweasel Speaker Paul Ryan.


45 posted on 12/05/2016 12:25:36 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Rack 'em, Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

as 0bama has shown over the last 8 years, with little to no opposition from the GOP in the house, Trump will need no support of the house to do what he wants


46 posted on 12/05/2016 12:53:51 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dadfly

I didn’t mean the leader himself. But check out the Irish pubs in NY and Boston.


47 posted on 12/05/2016 12:54:33 PM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Herodes

Yes ... LOL.

You’re precisely correct.

The much overrated Kevin McCarthy is likely still smartin’ over losing his leadership promotion due to some scandal, IIRC.

I didn’t know about “a better way” ditty ... (how utterly corny)!, so thanks very much for revealing THAT! LOL.

I’ve always viewed Kevin as a slimeball, weasel type of guy, who views himself as though he thinks he’s slick and smarter than he actually “is.”

I agree with you that both Kevin and Speaker Paul had better back POTUS TRUMP 100% and forcefully advocate for him 110% or there shall be heavy and swift consequences.


48 posted on 12/05/2016 1:56:07 PM PST by onyx (PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP'S VICTORY DONATE MONTHLY or JOIN CLUB 300!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sarge83

I heard that same thing. Which show was it?


49 posted on 12/05/2016 2:11:01 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

That’s not exactly a RINO position. Tariffs are ultimately paid, not by the company, but by the consumer. US companies may not move production overseas, but foreign competitors will sell their product here, and consumers have broadly benefited from that market entry, in more diverse and more competitively priced purchase options. So, trade regulators will either allow US markets to be ceded to foreign competitors, or impose tariffs on imports. Those tariffs are nothing but a regressive tax on American consumers.


50 posted on 12/05/2016 2:52:48 PM PST by VictorVector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
There’s a difference between “backbone” and wasting your time on exercises in futility.

Good thing you weren't around in 1773 when all that talk of "Independence" was being bandied about.

51 posted on 12/05/2016 3:37:01 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: VictorVector

I thought consumption taxes are better than income or wealth taxes


52 posted on 12/05/2016 4:24:27 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Pff, yeah there’s a real comparison between Congressional hacks passing bills that they know would amount to nothing and our founding fathers. /sarc


53 posted on 12/05/2016 4:47:43 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

So, tell me, which tax does this replace?


54 posted on 12/05/2016 5:42:36 PM PST by VictorVector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: VictorVector

The stupid ACA Real Estate tax?


55 posted on 12/05/2016 5:46:33 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I want to say Bulls and Bears or Cavuto.


56 posted on 12/06/2016 11:18:45 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sarge83

I watch FBN so it could be either


57 posted on 12/06/2016 12:27:26 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson