And in Wisconsin, I read that they're not even using the same machines.
Also in Wisconsin, some are by machine, some are by hand and I believe that's a no no.
Do we have a law case for the Supremes?
Original counts will stand and the state will certify if recount is incomplete.
Terrible mistake to involve the courts. Suppose Hillary and her team have been judge shopping since November 9. Suppose they have 3 Federal judges to nullify the results in PA, WI, and MI.
Now, you take it to the USSC, and their 4-4 deadlock leaves the lower court ruling in place.
You, by submitting this for adjudication by a Federal Court, are basically affirming that the authority of these courts extends over the State Legislatures' power to appoint electors, when it obviously does not.
NEVER NEVER NEVER acknowledge that Federal Courts can nullify a State Legislature's appointment of electors. They have no such power.
Motions filed in those courts do not deserve a reply. Orders of those courts should be ignored.
The Legislature of Michigan has appointed its electors. They should meet, vote, and send their votes to Congress. Let the courts go hang.
Is this a question or fact?
That is not what a WI state Senator said. He said if the recount is not completed by the time it has to be certified, the elector vote will not count. Some say this is why they are doing it, if they can sue for a recount and the recount is not "state certified" by the time the electors vote, they will not vote due to the ongoing recount.
If this is true, then the PA, MI nor WI electorate votes will not count and then Trump will be below 270 votes and then is marginalized and not a legal elected POTUS.