I don’t think nhwingut meant it that way. We know democrats are whacked out. The republican judges will see the constitutional issues and come down on the side of fairness, sanity and right. The dems just can’t do that.
But, us Constitutionalists must not ^depend^ on party affiliation to proffer our cause in this issue.
Just because an affiliation is ideological (e.g; “Republican”) this does not mean the judge will not bend to political expediency for sake of their (well paid) position.
SCOTUS-CJ-Roberts comes to mind. It appears he did not want pitchforks and torches outside his home if he decided against Obamacare. Neither would he consider Arkancide as an alternative.
We must be aware that personal considerations of the court adjudicators (overall, human) may change for any number of reasons.