[cmt21]

So this judge could force the recount to begin but it could be halted at a later date when the appeals court makes a ruling. Am I reading this correctly?

[roostercogburn]

Yes.
Effin’ rats always doing this shit.
Sorry Jim. Vulgarities are at times hard to control. The rage is boiling here at Free Republic because of these sore losers.

[Swanks]

Stein filed for recount. As is his proragative as winner DT filed a motion to dismiss. Court scheduled early this week. Stein, not happy with WI law allowing above, decides it best to bypass WI law B4 the hearing and fast track this via a Fed court.

[Pilgrim's Progress]

I guess it depends on whether the Mich Supreme court gets involved . . . I don’t expect them to overturn. If it goes to the SCOTUS, the best we can probably hope for is a 4-4 decision which will remand the case and the lower court decision will stand.

[MarMema]

Trump objected. State law says wait two days to recount after that, and the AG has a suit pending to try to stop the recount.

Sweet Jill was in a hurry and sued to get the recount to begin tomorrow. She lost that particular suit.

There has not been a halt to the recount. This morning was just about forcing it to begin earlier than Wed, which is when it is now scheduled to begin.

Many people misunderstood this entire thing.