1 posted on
12/02/2016 2:16:40 PM PST by
drewh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: drewh
Gee wiz...such a shock. A dem coming out against anything Trump.
2 posted on
12/02/2016 2:18:35 PM PST by
ColdOne
((poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~WE DID IT DEPLORABLES!EraseThe0bagambiLegacy!)
To: drewh
3 posted on
12/02/2016 2:18:35 PM PST by
MotorCityBuck
( Keep the change, you filthy animal! ,)
To: drewh
The Democrat Party continues its downward spiral into oblivion and total falure!!! End of story!!! LMAO!!!
4 posted on
12/02/2016 2:19:07 PM PST by
JLAGRAYFOX
(Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
To: drewh
To: drewh
What took the bi+ch so long?
6 posted on
12/02/2016 2:19:53 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(AMERICA! THANK YOU FOR MAKING MY SCREEN NAME OBSOLETE!)
To: drewh
Senator, another fundamental principle of our democracy is accepting the results of an election after you concede...
To: drewh
Sylogism:
Winners are not losers. Gillibrand is not a winner. What is she?
8 posted on
12/02/2016 2:20:21 PM PST by
bigbob
(We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
To: drewh
Dear Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.):
Nobody cares what you think. You are in the minority.
Talk to Harry Reid.
5.56mm
9 posted on
12/02/2016 2:22:37 PM PST by
M Kehoe
To: drewh
To: drewh
time to NUKE the DEMORATS!
To: drewh
finally a law a Democrat deigns to follow and obey. !!
12 posted on
12/02/2016 2:26:30 PM PST by
avital2
To: drewh
“Civilian control of our military is a fundamental principle of American democracy”
Dear Moron,
He is retired.
16 posted on
12/02/2016 2:31:19 PM PST by
Gamecock
(Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
To: drewh
I don't really have a problem with her doing this. The mandatory retirement period was written into law for a reason, so there ought to be a really good reason to waive it.
There's nothing outlandish about a member of Congress who thinks "Donald Trump wants to nominate James Mattis" isn't a good enough reason.
18 posted on
12/02/2016 2:35:31 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: drewh
we hear that she prefers someone named Barak Hussein Obama* for Secretary of Defense
*note: his true identity is a secret but this is his last-known alias
19 posted on
12/02/2016 2:37:40 PM PST by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
To: drewh
Thanks to the Harry Reid Rule (Nuclear Option), no one cares what the Democrats think any more about nominations.
To: drewh
They gave her the torch to carry. It’s a trial run to see if she’s the next potential First Female.
To: drewh
Who gives a crap? We have the votes.
To paraphrase ZEro, “We won the election.”
26 posted on
12/02/2016 2:45:49 PM PST by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: drewh
“Civilian control of our military is a fundamental principle of American democracy, and I will not vote for an exception to this rule.” As far as I'm concerned, the civilian control of the military rests with the Commander in Chief, not the Defense Secretary.
29 posted on
12/02/2016 2:52:07 PM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(SandyInPeoria just doesn't sound right... yet here I am.)
To: drewh
Not surprising but she isn’t going to get a lot of support.
To: drewh
“While I deeply respect General Mattis’s service..." (Token) Congresswoman, you are a damned liar.
35 posted on
12/02/2016 3:01:53 PM PST by
who knows what evil?
(Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson