Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump to meet with Democratic North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp about cabinet position
New York Daily News ^ | 12/01/2016 | CAMERON JOSEPH

Posted on 12/01/2016 9:23:40 AM PST by MaxistheBest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: MaxistheBest

There really is no excuse for having a Dem in the cabinet unless it is in a policy-harmless position and it delivers another senate seat.


61 posted on 12/01/2016 12:23:33 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest

Put her in charge of AG, and later tell her to eliminate the ethanol subsidy.


62 posted on 12/01/2016 1:05:35 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (The Media were SuperPacs for Clinton. Throw them in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Interesting potential if this placement comes off. It also shrinks the field for a Palin placement, should this ND senator go to the Dept. of Interior.

I know nothing about Heitkamp, but if she is a sensible Dem. and well qualified for a cabinet post, a chance to the other ND senate seat to Republicans should be a great long term gain. All the senate seats in the Dakotas and Montana should be Republican, but so far there are still those two in the Dem column (Heitkamp and Tester).

Most Palin talk has moved to the VA position today, from what I've heard.

63 posted on 12/01/2016 1:10:50 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Watch Obama take credit for anything good that happens during the Trump presidency ... if he happens to recognize that what’s good for the American people is actually good.


64 posted on 12/01/2016 2:18:14 PM PST by AZLiberty (A is now A once again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Unless you are an experienced corporate break up commander, the VA is going to be a good place to go to fail, whoever takes it.

A big job for the little lady, imho. Palin has been unhinged in most of her appearances for some time, but, that’s just me.


65 posted on 12/01/2016 3:02:49 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education is the farm team for more Marxists coming,... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MaxistheBest

And now Manchin too for DoE?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sW85ZcswiqM

Trump is going to work his way to a Graham/McCain/Collins-proof majority!


66 posted on 12/01/2016 4:55:54 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
This is a Trumpian threefer...3 WINS for the price of one

And what's in it for her?

1. Keystone and ND pipelines

2. Trump energy policy a big boost for ND fracking

(that is a lot of jobs in ND)

3. A first class ticket on the Trump Train

67 posted on 12/01/2016 9:48:11 PM PST by spokeshave (In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; StoneWall Brigade

Hell yes. This 52 (pending the Bayou) is too close for comfort, damn that NH robbery (and the ND robbery of 2012).

I heard Manchin being floated for Energy Sec. I hate this guts but it would worth it.


68 posted on 12/02/2016 12:43:59 AM PST by Impy (Toni Preckwinkle for Ambassador to the Sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; StoneWall Brigade

Of course we would not Manchin’s seat cause of WV rat governor, brain fart.


69 posted on 12/02/2016 12:46:48 AM PST by Impy (Toni Preckwinkle for Ambassador to the Sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

How is it a win to put a Democrat back in charge of the EPA?

She’s going to lose the seat anyway. No need to pay for it with a cabinet post.


70 posted on 12/02/2016 12:54:37 AM PST by JediJones (We must deport all liberals until we can figure out what the hell is going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
1. Keystone and ND pipelines

She's supported those all along and I expect she'll continue to do so as a Senator.

2. Trump energy policy a big boost for ND fracking

Which she will support as a Senator and would play well during her reelection campaign.

3. A first class ticket on the Trump Train

A first class ticket to a minor cabinet position, then obscurity and an end to her electoral career. I doubt that fits in with her career goals.

71 posted on 12/02/2016 3:27:52 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; StoneWall Brigade

The governor of WV is a Democrat, as is the Gov-elect, so naming Manchin to the Cabinet only would get us a different Democrat appointed to his Senate seat for the next two years. While perhaps this would increase our chances of taking the seat in 2018, we can’t be sure that the person appointed won’t be as personally popular as Manchin (and he won’t have liberal votes cast in the Senate between 2010 and 2016 to throw in his face), plus I think that we would beat Manchin anyhow. While Harper Polling just came out with a poll showing Manchin up by 51-39 over Congressman Evan Jenkins and by 57-35 over AG Patrick Morrissey, polling two years away from the election is pretty useless, and I don’t think that Manchin can survive unless he basically votes like a Republican for the next two years (which would be a huge departure from his voting record).

So I’d rather if Trump named Heitekamp instead of Manchin to something (although if he can name both to positions where they can’t do much damage, I guess that I’d take it).


72 posted on 12/02/2016 5:57:24 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Impy

Good point


73 posted on 12/02/2016 6:08:03 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Secretary of Energy?

I wish people would keep in mind that the Department of Energy does very very little for energy. It is really the civilian agency responsible for defense nuclear weapons activities.

DOE's total budget for FY 2016 was $29.6M.

Of this:
$19.6 was for Atomic Energy Defense Activities: (Nuclear weapons, Naval Reactors (Admiral Rickover's outfit), and Nuclear waste clean-up (crony capitalism to pretend to do something about the legacy waste problem).
$5.7B was for Basic Science (national labs operating accelerators, etc.)

These activities were the province of the old Atomic Energy Commission which became ERDA under Nixon.

This leaves exactly $2.9B for energy activities and other assorted administrative tasks. Of this amount:
$638M is for fossil energy - this is a drop in the bucket, $2 / year per American citizen.
$1B is for nuclear energy (when was the last time that the DOE built a nuclear reactor?)
There is an additional $292 M for ARPA-E [DOE's venture capital effort after all the real venture capital firms have scraped off the good projects).

74 posted on 12/03/2016 10:02:19 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson