Posted on 11/30/2016 6:28:18 PM PST by Cheerio
The debate on Man-made Climate Change, aka Anthropogenic Global Warming, has been raging for a couple decades now.
The establishment media has told us repeatedly in recent years that there is consensus among 97% of climate scientists that global warming is real, and that it is caused by human activity. For many people, this appeal to authority has been convincing, and they lash out at any opposition calling them climate-deniers or worse.
Recent data has emerged that casts major doubt on the general consensus. So how could 97% of the worlds climate experts get something like this wrong?
Most people assume that the scientific community acts purely in a non-biased way, using methods that have been standardized across the board. So much faith has been put into establishment science, especially by the left, that to question any of the findings is akin to heresy.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativedailypost.com ...
Because it wasn't 97% of all scientists. From Politifact: "The 97 percent figure comes from a subsample of climate scientists in Dorans study, and Santorum correctly describes its small size: 74 out of 77 respondents said they agreed that climate change is man-made."
This is a typical misuse of percentages by the Left. I remember when Clinton had the assault weapon bar in force about a year and the Brady Bunch touted a "33% reduction in crimes by assault weapons". Turns out that the crimes by AW dropped from something like .09 to .06.
For starters most of that 97% weren't climatologists of any kind much less "climate experts."
Secondly, they were never 97% of anything but their own Fake News imaginations...
Global Warming Skeptics Question Authority
Princeton Professor Denies Global Warming Theory
German scientists reject man-made global warming
Real Scientist Uncover Serious Flaw In Global Warming Data
Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]
'Consensus' On Man-Made Global Warming Collapses in 2008
Perth electrical engineer's discovery will change climate change debate October 04, 2015
Top Physicist Freeman Dyson: Obama 'Took the Wrong Side' on Climate Change October 14, 2015
Global Warming Petition Project Scientists who reject AGW
31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs
Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit 'Irrational' * 'Based On Nonsense' * 'Leading us down a false path' November 19, 2015
What a BS click-bait headline.
>>Global warming is real its very real and its caused by human activity. The planet has a fever.<<
You would be wise to use the proper /s notation when stating something like that with s straight face. The effect is great in person but on the intewebz people might think you are serious.
Global Warming is a Communist Plot!
Trump Effect was my first thought.
It’s really about totalitarianism through establishing a fear that infects globally. I’m not buying.
“Global warming is real its very real and its caused by human activity. The planet has a fever.”
My understanding is that most of the northern hemisphere was covered in ice and then came the SUVs and melted the ice and made the northern hemisphere a nice place to live.
https://youtu.be/S-obMyf4qmQ?t=108
Worm sure has turned.
We let Donald on for a ride. Note we dont flinch when he insets any twitter spikes to steer us. Note the transition team coming aboard. Note what we do to the swampy ones.
Yah, right! That's just like H-> announcing in the third presidential debate, "We have 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military, who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin, and they are designed to influence our election."
We were led to believe those 17 agencies, all acting independently in a non-biased way, reached the same conclusion.
What a bald-faced lie!
When one imagines having the power of the presidency within one's grasp, one can just order it to be so, like a monarch! And BOOM! It will just be so!
HF
And the smaller scale takes about 500 years to manifest changes in its overall makeup...
ocean conveyor belt thermohaline circulationIt takes about 500 years for the conveyor belt to turn over the oceans waters and make one complete trip around the Earth.
That article tries to make a case for AWG but that's ridiculous in face of the basic facts.
Why do they recap the history of the world and then the “bombshell” is in paragraph ten? I hate that about modern writing.
“Trump effect! Again!”
***********************************
“TRUMP EFFECT” -— Get used to using that descriptive phrase, we’re going to see these occurrences more and more.
Baloney. The sun controls the temperature. Better read COLD SUN. Great book.
Expect to see more and more of these Trump EffectsHis seemingly effortless ability to expose fraud(s) at so many different levels in a short period of time is nothing short of a miracle.
That is a totally unfounded and ridiculous claim. The "end of the world" has been upon us for millenniums, yet never happened.
Simple, If you want to be funded you will go along with our scam agenda
Easy. It's just like the media getting Trump's election so wrong. They have an agenda that doesn't necessarily match the results of their "science".
I agree.
Here’s to that! Cheers!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.