Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SF judge explains why 66,000 arrest warrants were discarded
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | November 30, 2016 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 11/30/2016 5:49:51 PM PST by artichokegrower

San Francisco’s chief judge says he and his colleagues discarded 66,000 arrest warrants issued over five years for quality-of-life crimes, like sleeping on the sidewalk, because it made no sense to lock people up for fines they couldn’t afford.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: arrest; arrestwarrants; california; crime; crimes; discarded; judge; judges; qualityoflife; sanfrancisco; warrants
Stewart noted state lawmakers’ similar response after learning that 4 million Californians had seen their driver’s licenses suspended for failing to pay traffic fines, increased substantially by fees imposed by cash-strapped local courts. Gov. Jerry Brown signed an amnesty law last year for unpaid tickets issued before 2013, cutting penalties by 50 percent, or 80 percent for low-income drivers


So in California if I am a productive member of society I have to pay 100% of my traffic tickets but if I am described as being low income my fine is reduced 80%. What happened to equal protection under the law?

1 posted on 11/30/2016 5:49:51 PM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“What happened to equal protection under the law?”

Shirley, you jest.


2 posted on 11/30/2016 5:51:24 PM PST by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Sounds like a lawsuit in the making.


3 posted on 11/30/2016 5:51:59 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Don’t expect the State Attorney General Kamala Harris to prosecute that case. She only pursues PC issues that Gov. Brown , the Globalists and the Greens would approve of.


4 posted on 11/30/2016 5:55:22 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I was at traffic court in Santa Cruz:

First guy up at the mic is a hispanic guy there for a citation for driving with no license.

RIGHT away the Judge addresses the whole courtroom, “Can I see a show of HANDS for how many are here for that same offense...?”

They all look at him with ribbons of drool coming from the corners of their mouths as the question is translated into Spanish.

A SEA of hands shoots skyward.

“For those with their hands raised, line up at the clerk’s station, I am BULK dismissing your citations, you are here for no reason other than the way the law is written...”

AND THAT WAS THAT..!!!

And then I was suddenly alone in the courtroom, with just 5 or 6 other honkies for fleecing.


5 posted on 11/30/2016 5:55:50 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“If the executive and legislative branches can do it, so can we!”

Yep, separation of powers is anathema to a socialist government.


6 posted on 11/30/2016 5:55:52 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

A lawsuit would have to be brought by a private citizen through an attorney.


7 posted on 11/30/2016 5:58:18 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

“Stewart said the judges have chosen the best alternative available and don’t plan to resume issuing warrants. Still, he said, “people in the neighborhood have a right to be upset.””

I can only wish that someone urinates in the judges courtroom


8 posted on 11/30/2016 6:02:45 PM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
because it made no sense to lock people up for fines they couldn’t afford.

Yeah it does, it makes all the sense in the world. Arrest them and make them work off the fines. Pardoning criminality creates an incentive to commit more crimes. You would think a judge would know this all too well.

9 posted on 11/30/2016 6:04:56 PM PST by Bullish (The fly on Hillary's forehead knows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Kamala Harris is now a Senator elect. Now I’m gonna be sick again.


10 posted on 11/30/2016 6:06:11 PM PST by Bullish (The fly on Hillary's forehead knows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Fleecing is one of the few things big gov-co sees us productive working people good for.


11 posted on 11/30/2016 6:13:45 PM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

You shoulda raised your hand.


12 posted on 11/30/2016 6:19:46 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I couldn’t really “afford” any of the fines i have had to pay. I was required to pay them anyway. I think that is the point of fines. If they were easily affordable, many people would disregard the laws.


13 posted on 11/30/2016 6:20:33 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Damn, I forgot.
I hear she’s difficult to work with, almost as bad as Hillary. Rumor is, she’s really not even an American.


14 posted on 11/30/2016 6:21:18 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

This is further proof most laws are in place to extract $$$ for government to waste.
Everyone please remember this simple reality when you receive a jury summons.


15 posted on 11/30/2016 6:38:41 PM PST by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Veggie Todd

He never jests. And don’t call him Shirley.


16 posted on 11/30/2016 6:49:00 PM PST by EvilCapitalist (Lock her up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
...you are here for no reason other than the way the law is written...”

HUH ? isn't that why most of us are in court ?
17 posted on 11/30/2016 8:00:10 PM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

But they vote. And 4 of 5 of the Mexicans there IN THE COURT ROOM were illegal aliens.


18 posted on 11/30/2016 10:27:08 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

They should just s top enforcing the law altogether.

See how that works.


19 posted on 11/30/2016 10:40:22 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson