Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victims’ families oppose (Establishment Republican) senators’ bid to alter Sept. 11 law
Associated Press ^ | 11/30/16 | Richard Lardner

Posted on 11/30/2016 4:06:13 PM PST by bobk3

The families of Sept. 11 victims are voicing their opposition to a proposed change to a new law that allows them to sue Saudi Arabia for its alleged backing of the attackers.

In a statement Wednesday, they say the adjustment would “effectively gut” the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. Saudi Arabia, a critical U.S. ally in the Middle East, sought to prevent the law from being passed.

Republicans John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina say their measure is necessary to ensure lawsuits can only be brought against countries that knowingly engaged in the financing or sponsorship of terrorism.

But Terry Strada, national chair of a group representing Sept. 11 families, says the senators are trying to “torpedo” the law by pushing changes Saudi Arabia demanded.

.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Another example of the rats (Establishment Republicans) scurrying to protect their special interests before Donald Trump becomes President.

Saudi Arabia is one of the biggest bribers/donors in Washington D.C. and one of the biggest sugar daddy special interests for John McCain and Lindsay Graham.

.

1 posted on 11/30/2016 4:06:13 PM PST by bobk3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bobk3
This was one of the dumbest pieces of legislation ever to pass in Congress. You knew this was the case when it was passed with nearly unanimous support.

There was no way in hell any foreign government would be subject to civil lawsuits in U.S. courts, regardless of what this law said.

2 posted on 11/30/2016 4:08:04 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobk3

McCain & Graham once again fighting for the enemy.


3 posted on 11/30/2016 4:12:12 PM PST by MeganC (Ik ben Geert Wilders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; bobk3

.
You must be one of those that support the absurd idea of a “World Court.”

Of course foreign governments can be subject to a US court. If they wish to sell us their products, or their citizens wish to travel here.

Simple.


4 posted on 11/30/2016 4:12:31 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bobk3

“Saudi Arabia is one of the biggest bribers/donors in Washington D.C. and one of the biggest sugar daddy special interests for John McCain and Lindsay Graham.”

Exactly.


5 posted on 11/30/2016 4:13:41 PM PST by heterosupremacist (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Right.

How much money are you willing to pony up when the U.S. government is successfully sued in an Iraqi, Libyan, Syrian, or Egyptian court for $500 trillion?

6 posted on 11/30/2016 4:14:04 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bobk3

That’s Saudi Owned McCain and Graham.


7 posted on 11/30/2016 4:14:37 PM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
P.S. -- It really takes a pathetic sh!t pile of a country to sue another country for its alleged involvement in terrorist attacks on U.S. soil that killed thousands of people.

If the government of Saudi Arabia had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks, the country should have been obliterated from the map, not sued in a civil court.

8 posted on 11/30/2016 4:16:24 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

It’s hard to blow up a country when you’re holding the hand of the king on your ranch in Texas.


9 posted on 11/30/2016 4:18:20 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

.
So you believe that the citizens of a monarchist country should have to die for the clandestine actions of their masters?

Now that’s real justice!
.


10 posted on 11/30/2016 4:19:15 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bobk3

Noe we know which Senators have received money from the Saudi princes.


11 posted on 11/30/2016 4:19:56 PM PST by fella ("As this iiwas before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Of course not. I'm being rhetorical here. LOL.

My point is that a country that responds to an act of war by filing lawsuits in a civil court is a pathetic one, indeed. It takes a country run by lawyers to come up with a law as dumb as that one.

12 posted on 11/30/2016 4:21:58 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

.
All that they have the power to extract from us (i.e. NONE.)

You really don’t understand these things, do you!
.


13 posted on 11/30/2016 4:22:00 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Oh, OK. So let’s go around the world suing everybody like a bunch of simpering fags.


14 posted on 11/30/2016 4:24:33 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

.
>> “My point is that a country that responds to an act of war by filing lawsuits in a civil court is a pathetic one” <<

Fail!

It is a means of working through our own legal system to extract wealth from those that only understand wealth.
.


15 posted on 11/30/2016 4:24:52 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Then you really can’t object when they work through our own legal system to protect themselves using those who only understand wealth (i.e., buying Congressmen), right?


16 posted on 11/30/2016 4:28:32 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bobk3

17 posted on 11/30/2016 4:58:06 PM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobk3

Sit on this until Trump can veto it


18 posted on 11/30/2016 5:03:09 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (MSM = HOME OF FAKE NEWS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

.
They’ve been doing it as long as I’ve been alive.

The bill at least allows some turnabout.
.


19 posted on 11/30/2016 5:03:49 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bobk3

This is Trump’s problem and why he has to operate in the extreme. The Republicans will oppose him along with and taking their lead from the Democrats.


20 posted on 11/30/2016 5:16:20 PM PST by arthurus (Mrs Clinton is The Great Conniver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson