Other than being concerned that he will be nicknamed “munchkin”, I have no particular idea. I am not a slavish devotee eg; “Trump can do no wrong”, but in general I trust his multi-instance ability to select not just good, but superb talent.
Now you may bring up Romney. That of course gives me pause. I don’t want Mitt anywhere near anything of prime importance, but I would not mind having him near something of subprime importance. It is my belief, and only my belief, that Mitt might be being interviewed for something less than SOS. And he might not accept it. I don’t really care; I absolutely and utterly do not want him as SOS, that is all I care about.
As far as I am concerned, this whole thing, this whole election episode is subliminally dominated by the egregious overreaches of the 0bama admin. If it was not for the crap that he pulled, we would not be worried about executive orders revoking parts of the Constitution or invalidating this or that law. We SHOULD NOT HAVE to be so damned worried about who wins the election because such a person is supposed to operate within the law. And we know, or we think we know the law, generally accept it, and work with and within it.
I have 100 times more confidence than Donald Trump, warts and all, will stay within the law than I have that BHO will. He will make a few mistakes. He will make, I am confident, many more good moves than mistakes. Such is unavoidable. It USED TO be avoidable, but then the country elected 0bama and got a pile of crap in the deal. The country looks like a venue where an 0bama rally was held: littered with trash. For the moment it is impossible for me to believe we could do worse.
I don’t like the Goldman connection.
No worries — Robert Reich has a trademark on the nickname Munchkin.