Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry
I thought the same thoughts and concluded, the houses were much more dry and volatile than living trees with moisture within.

If the fire is moving fast enough, and they did say 80 MPH winds, the fire could continue from tree to tree and burn out behind it while landing on tar (shingle) roofs, etc.

20 posted on 11/30/2016 8:29:59 AM PST by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: knarf

Fall leaves, dry and brittle, are still on those trees. The trunks don’t look scorched. If it was a rapidly moving ground fire fed by ground litter, leaves primarily, then wooden structures would be at high risk, true, that makes sense. But, there are condos and such on mountaintops burned out, too, and they appear to be concrete or at least stucco. Trees standing with fall leaves all around them. Doesn’t make sense.


24 posted on 11/30/2016 8:34:18 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson