Dem Party email raises recount integrity concerns in liberal Dane County

Wisconsn Watchdog ^ | 11-29-16 | M.D. Kittle

[afraidfortherepublic]

So sorry. I did a search on the complete headline and came up with nothing. I’m thinking that the search function does not work any more. Well, new day and new eyes because I posted this over again.

[Alas Babylon!]

Yeah but are there 22,000 of them?

They have an Everest to climb to overturn the results, and without massive cheating that will be the most blatant on Earth ever, it’s not going to happen.

After this is over, every state with a Republican governor and legislature better work like the dickens to firm up these frivolous election recount laws.

The US Congress then needs to come up with a solid, non-court overturnable law on photo ID and proof of citizenship.

Since the democrats support these recount efforts, then they’ll all be amenable to pushing through the laws, no? /S

[stylin19a]

All they want is to get the seal broken on the Ballot Bag or Container. If nobody from the other side is watching...abracadabra.

Ballot Count – 4.(a) The board of canvassers opens the ballot bag or ballot container and removes the contents.

The canvassers or tabulators count the number of ballots in the ballot bag, excluding any ballots that were set aside and not counted by the election inspectors on election night under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 7.51(2).

These “set aside” ballots should have been marked and bundled by the election inspectors on election night.

The board of canvassers reviews all ballots marked rejected, defective, and objected to, to decide whether such ballots were correctly categorized when the ballots were first examined after the election.