Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Party email raises recount integrity concerns in liberal Dane County
Wisconsn Watchdog ^ | 11-29-16 | M.D. Kittle

Posted on 11/29/2016 9:50:54 PM PST by bigbob

A Democratic Party email calling for temporary workers to man a massive and unprecedented presidential election recall effort in Dane County had Republicans crying foul this week.

The Democratic Party of Dane County advised that County Clerk Scott McDonell was looking for temp workers beginning Thursday to help check over 316,000 ballots cast in this month’s election.

Recount workers could earn $20 an hour, maybe more, on 12-hour shifts, the notice stated.

“We’re asked to forward this to people we think would be up to the job and have time to do this. Please send people to county.clerk@countyofdane.com if interested – or if you’re interested,’ the message said.

While Dane County is one of the more liberal places in the country (more than 70 percent of voters cast ballots for Democrats in the most recent election), Scott Grabins said the email’s suggestion the county government was working exclusively with Democrats to fill the election positions was wrong.

“When I saw that email I was pretty pissed,” said Grabins, chairman of the Republican Party of Dane County. “The way it was worded didn’t explicitly say Scott McDonell asked them to do this, but it inferred a lot.”

McDonell told Wisconsin Watchdog that the whole matter was a “communications problem.”

(Excerpt) Read more at watchdog.org ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: danecounty; recount; scottmcdonnell; wirecount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Yeah...right.

You've got to watch these bastiges every single minute.

The encouraging news is, Jim Troupis who pretty much wrote the Wisconsind Recount book has a lot of experience working with the county clerks and has high confidence in them, regardless of party affiliation. And the procedure has been carefully scrutinized and improved after the first statewide recount a few years ago.

1 posted on 11/29/2016 9:50:54 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigbob

This, in effect, means kids from UW-Madison - a bastion of the Leftist/hillary fantasy.


2 posted on 11/29/2016 9:52:41 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

who probably have difficulty “counting”...

But, good folks are on the job and watching everything very closely.


3 posted on 11/29/2016 9:53:49 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Dane County was overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton, so if anyone benefitted from “irregularities” there...


4 posted on 11/29/2016 9:58:54 PM PST by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Oh look, there are boxes of uncounted ballots in the closet and they are all for Hillary. What were the chances?

Pray America woke


5 posted on 11/29/2016 10:07:55 PM PST by bray (The Silent Majority ROARED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

whatever could go wrong with this? /s


6 posted on 11/29/2016 10:09:27 PM PST by b4me (If Jesus came to set us free, why are so many professed Believers still in chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“Recount workers could earn $20 an hour, maybe more, on 12-hour shifts”
==
I’d count real slow and stretch the gig out for a year at that pay.


7 posted on 11/29/2016 10:10:47 PM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I listened to the interview with him yesterday and he put me at ease a bit over the procedures and the fact that he praised the clerks as they take their job seriously.


8 posted on 11/29/2016 10:13:59 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Well at least the judge shot down Stein on her lawsuit for a hand recount of all counties

On Tuesday, a Dane County Circuit Court judge rejected Stein’s lawsuit demanding each of Wisconsin’s 72 counties conduct a hand-count of the ballots. Wisconsin has until Dec. 13 to complete the recount or it may run the risk of abandoning its 10 electoral votes.
9 posted on 11/29/2016 10:19:02 PM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Temp workers are not accountable maintaining the integrity of a recount. They will create more problems with counting errors and can be instructed to game the count.


10 posted on 11/29/2016 10:21:26 PM PST by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
All these reassurances of vigilant supervision are surely very comforting but somehow I'm still not comfortable with the idea that a bunch of hirelings will have their hands on actual ballots; the chance of mischief is too great.

The old saying generally attributed to Stalin keeps coming to mind: "The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."

11 posted on 11/29/2016 10:28:38 PM PST by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

The judge did not mandate hand counts, but did encourage them.


12 posted on 11/29/2016 10:35:04 PM PST by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Do a detailed check of how many college students voted both in their home State and in the State they go to college and you'd knock a major chunk out of Hillary's votes.
13 posted on 11/29/2016 10:52:14 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

In Texas, there would have to be equal numbers of Republican and Democrat recount workers.


14 posted on 11/29/2016 11:23:42 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I believe every vote recounted must be verified by a member of each Party.


15 posted on 11/29/2016 11:58:21 PM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

“The judge did not mandate hand counts, but did encourage them”

The WI Election folks nixed Stein’s call for a hand recount, did they not? Stein then sued to overturn that decision and the Judge who heard her complaint threw it out.

Am I correct then in assuming Stein LOST her bid too force a hand recount?


16 posted on 11/30/2016 12:02:17 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

He would not force hand counts, but did encourage them. Said both that the law did not give her the right, but also that hand counting was inherently the best way to recount.


17 posted on 11/30/2016 12:43:06 AM PST by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I wonder if part of the plan is to flip Stein votes to Clinton. Of course, Stein will not object even if all of her votes are flipped.

Clinton must have some such tricks up her sleeve to go to these lengths in what looks like an obvious lost cause.


18 posted on 11/30/2016 1:30:04 AM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

...”I believe every vote recounted must be verified by a member of each Party.”...

What rational person does not believe that this is an open attempt at FRAUD. The left has gotten away with lawlessness for the past 8 years and they think they can continue without reservation. I believe that this nation is fed up with these political criminals, who are getting rich while trying to upend our system without any proof. That would be like accusing someone of murder without any proof that murder took place. Personally, I am beginning to despise these people.


19 posted on 11/30/2016 2:31:18 AM PST by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

I worked a recount in a congressional race 6 years ago. We were divided into tables of 3. Each table had a leader from one of the parties the. The odd numbered tables have leaders of one party, and the even numbered tables have a leader from the other party. There are then 2 workers one from each party at each table. Then there are observers from various intersted parties looking over each table. There were some from the candidates, RNC, DNC, House Republican and Democratic caucuses, etc. There is a strict limit of observers allowed in the counting room. The number can’t exceed the number of workers. Towards the end as tables get shut down inpairs, observers must leave the room to keep the balance.

It was while talking to one of the Republican congressional staffers that I found out that if the election night results prevailed, our new congressman would get the old congressman’s office, because the lottery had already assigned all the other freshmen congtlressmen’s offices. As the Republican candidate beat the most senior House Democrat, he got an excellent office with a view of the Capitol from the window. The outgoing congressman’s staff was just as petty as the outgoing Clinton Whitehouse staff in 2001. Real sore losers.


20 posted on 11/30/2016 2:51:18 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson