Posted on 11/29/2016 4:22:37 PM PST by Impy
I forgot that. All the more reason to keep him way out in the pasture. Like, way back on the back 40.
Go back to the park bench and play patty cake with Pelousy. SHUT. UP.
“There’s Gingrich doing what he loves to do, again - stabbing people in the back.”
Hate the man...he’s always trying to one up somebody so he can get on MSM...it’s all about this:
http://www.gingrichproductions.com/
He’s self promoting his books and videos. He doesn’t care who he hurts. Trump needs to send him to Siberia.
I don’t know where you live but you don’t need to show id in Illinois to vote.
I have never heard of Loretta Sanchez being mentioned as a Presidential candidate.
The other democrat who just beat her in the Senate race, Kamala Harris, is regarded as a future candidate for President or VP. For that reason I actually advocated a vote for Sanchez over her, as distasteful as that was.
Yea, he turned against Trump early after the victory reflecting that Trump told him. His “campaign device” flub was his worst and it came on about Day 2 or 3.
Ping
Obama believes this. He even encouraged illegals to get to the polls.
I’m thinking that Newt has been taken off the prospects list and can’t believe it....else, he might have brought up Obama’s actual encouragement for illegals to vote. No way he’s ignorant that it happened.
Obama told illegals to vote. Illegals vote.
Trump should set up a commission with a prosecutor to examine and identify illegals who voted in our election. Same with dead voters.
Clearly one of the things Trump is best at is making the manipulating the media. I don’t think his tweet was ill planned. I think it was intentional on two fronts. First he called it what it was. There were illegals voting. I think it wouldn’t take much to dig down and prove it unlike Stein. Secondly it put the media in the position of having to swear there was no fraud, our elections are safe and sound, nobody could actually swing the election. In other words, they have had to spend their time saying things to discount Trump’s accusation which also then discounts Stein and Clinton. They were caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place.
Anyone with at least one functioning brain synapse (that eliminates RATS, Berniebots, Never Trumpers, Cruzbots, etc.) can see the numerous maps published by numerous sources that CLEARLY show Hitlery’s biggest areas of support were...wait for it...AREAS WITH MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF ILLEGALS!!!
“¡VIVA CIUDADES DEL SANTUARIO!”
Gee...think ANY of them voted? Any guess as to who they voted for?
You are correct, I misspoke. Do I remember correctly that Loretta didn't use her married name "Sanchez" until she ran for office?
USA Today, PROVE it false!
That’s not true
Usually Newt is dead on, but every once in a while he goes off his meds.
Wait wait wait. So the media can call Trump’s claims as “baseless”; but do they do the same for claims by Democrats that the results in MI and WI were hacked? Why are they they not called “baseless”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.