To: Seaplaner
I sense wholesale fraud here. I know the Dems, and I strongly suspect that their motives and tactics are as ruthless as they are corrupt. Would they go through the trouble if they had not have the means and ability to corrupt the vote count? I agree. This is clearly an election theft in progress. I hope Trump is taking this more seriously than some on this board. And, I suspect that he is. Any other Republican would already be apologizing to Hillary and congratulating her on her hard-won victory by now.
To: Cementjungle
I agree. This is clearly an election theft in progress. I hope Trump is taking this more seriously than some on this board
If it gains any traction the MSM will really get behind her saying they knew the polls were right
16 posted on
11/29/2016 3:45:48 PM PST by
uncbob
To: Cementjungle
Recounts very rarely swing many votes. The infamous recount-enabled Senatorial win for Al "Diapers" Franken swung 527 votes.
To win Wisconsin, Hillary! has to swing over 27,000 votes. That kind of recount swing is basically impossible. The *average* swing on a statewide recount is around 270 votes, only two orders of magnitude (!) less than what Hillary! would need.
19 posted on
11/29/2016 3:55:29 PM PST by
Campion
(Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson