Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBrow

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/11/29/trump-breaks-antonin-scalia-suggests-jail-loss-citizenship-flag-burning/

The Supreme Court decided in Texas v. Johnson that burning the American flag, no matter how distasteful, is constitutionally protected free speech. The decision was not unanimous. In fact, it was a 5-4 decision and one of those siding with the majority was the late Antonin Scalia.


11 posted on 11/29/2016 5:49:33 AM PST by lancium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: lancium

ok so the next SC justice won’t be exactly like Scalia


17 posted on 11/29/2016 5:51:15 AM PST by ari-freedom (The Social Justice War is over and we won!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: lancium

And I believe Scalia was, as usual, correct in his decision.


18 posted on 11/29/2016 5:51:35 AM PST by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: lancium

They were wrong. This will be changed.


29 posted on 11/29/2016 5:59:29 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: lancium

Burn in hell, Antonin Scalia.

The SOB got his due when he dropped dead.


32 posted on 11/29/2016 6:00:13 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: lancium

I’m with the late Mr. Justice Antonin Scalia on this.

But don’t do it in front of me ... I’ll risk a misdemeanor assault charge to stop you.


61 posted on 11/29/2016 6:19:10 AM PST by NorthMountain (Northmountain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: lancium
In fact, it was a 5-4 decision and one of those siding with the majority was the late Antonin Scalia.

Yes, because Scalia was not afraid to rule the right way, even knowing it would be unpopular.

88 posted on 11/29/2016 6:45:32 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: lancium

Maybe burning a personally owned flag could be what the jurists defined as first amendment protected speech, but I believe the flag in question flew at the school, owned by the school and the patriotic students took umbrage, tore it down and burned it. Absolutely no coverage by the supreme court ruling IMO and Trumps suggestion to yank citizenship for these morons (if they even are citizens) could be useful in ridding us of vermin of that caliber.


105 posted on 11/29/2016 7:18:39 AM PST by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson