Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gdani

“Nominating Petraeus would send an unmistakably clear signal that what Hillary did with classified info.....was no big deal.”

You are exactly wrong. What Petraeus did WAS no big deal. He broke a couple technical rules - the equivalent of driving with expired inspection. He should have been let off with a warning for what he did - especially after we watch as Hillary Clinton gets absolved for deliberately committing actual crimes against the state to cover up other crimes against the state, and we have yet to learn all the damage she may have caused!

The double standard here is profound!

Selecting Petraeus as SOS would send the message that his politically motivated and excessive punishment for a minor technicality by a vindictive democrat administration will not stand.

I would be thrilled to see him get the SOS because he’d do a bang up job and it would be a big f u to the democrats and the press

It would put them in notice you aren’t railroading out people anymore for personal sex scandals and minor infractions - and then when your guy does it “it’s just a blow job” and “at this point what difference does it make!”


92 posted on 11/29/2016 8:05:17 PM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated
Selecting Petraeus as SOS would send the message that his politically motivated

I would like Petraeus to lead the investigation into Benghazi and the weapons given to Muslim terrorists by Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton. Hang them both when we finally see the money and weapons trails.

94 posted on 12/01/2016 7:30:42 AM PST by politicianslie (What would a terrorist do if he were made POTUS? : Exactly what Hussein Obama is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson